Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share AI for Good Not Evil: A Conversation with Suresh Venkatasubramanian (Part Two)
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
AI for Good Not Evil: A Conversation with Suresh Venkatasubramanian (Part Two)
In the conclusion of Dominique’s conversation with Suresh Venkatasubramanian, the two discuss his work on the AI Bill of Rights and Technical Companion which offer guidance on ethical, responsible AI development. Suresh explains the need to continuously monitor AI after deployment, unlike traditional software. He stresses that while beneficial, AI requires constant maintenance and supervision. They explore potential business benefits of investing in trustworthy AI, though costs come first while rewards follow later. Reputations can quickly change if AI problems arise. Transparency, monitoring systems, and documenting how they work is key.
Show Notes:
Dominique’s Disclaimer: The views expressed are my own and do not constitute legal advice, nor do they constitute an attorney-client relationship. They also do not represent the views of my employer.
Show Notes:
- Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights here.
- Technical Companion for the AI Bill of Rights here (at page 11)
- Pregnant Woman Falsely Accused of Carjacking By Facial Recognition Glitch
- Study shows Trusted Companies Outperform their Peers by 400%
- Survey: In AI We Do Not Trust
- California, August 17, 2023, Joint Resolution affirming the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (SCR 17)
- Connecticut, June 2023 law establishing a working group to assess the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights called SB 1103
Dominique’s Disclaimer: The views expressed are my own and do not constitute legal advice, nor do they constitute an attorney-client relationship. They also do not represent the views of my employer.
View all episodes
By Dominique Shelton Leipzig
5
11 ratings
In the conclusion of Dominique’s conversation with Suresh Venkatasubramanian, the two discuss his work on the AI Bill of Rights and Technical Companion which offer guidance on ethical, responsible AI development. Suresh explains the need to continuously monitor AI after deployment, unlike traditional software. He stresses that while beneficial, AI requires constant maintenance and supervision. They explore potential business benefits of investing in trustworthy AI, though costs come first while rewards follow later. Reputations can quickly change if AI problems arise. Transparency, monitoring systems, and documenting how they work is key.
Show Notes:
Dominique’s Disclaimer: The views expressed are my own and do not constitute legal advice, nor do they constitute an attorney-client relationship. They also do not represent the views of my employer.
Show Notes:
- Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights here.
- Technical Companion for the AI Bill of Rights here (at page 11)
- Pregnant Woman Falsely Accused of Carjacking By Facial Recognition Glitch
- Study shows Trusted Companies Outperform their Peers by 400%
- Survey: In AI We Do Not Trust
- California, August 17, 2023, Joint Resolution affirming the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (SCR 17)
- Connecticut, June 2023 law establishing a working group to assess the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights called SB 1103
Dominique’s Disclaimer: The views expressed are my own and do not constitute legal advice, nor do they constitute an attorney-client relationship. They also do not represent the views of my employer.