The line between inspiration and infringement is becoming increasingly blurred in the age of AI. Tech giants are building powerful music generation models by training them on vast libraries of existing songs, but did they get permission from the artists who created them? This episode unpacks the explosive legal battles between major record labels and AI companies, exploring the core arguments that could reshape copyright law forever.

We dive deep into the "fair use" defense, examining whether an AI "learning" from a song is the same as a human artist being influenced by it. We explore the lawsuits that claim AI is not just learning, but creating direct, style-imitating competitors that threaten the livelihoods of human artists. Imagine spending a decade perfecting your unique vocal style, only to find an AI tool that can replicate it flawlessly in seconds, without your consent or compensation. That's the stark reality and fear driving this industry-wide conflict.

What you'll learn in this episode:

- What is the "fair use" doctrine and does it really apply to AI training?

- Why are Universal Music Group and Sony Music suing AI startups?

- Can an AI itself be held liable for copyright infringement?

- What are the landmark lawsuits currently defining the future of AI and music?

- How do artists prove an AI was trained on their specific work?

- If an AI generates music in the style of a deceased artist, who owns the copyright?

- What is the legal difference between AI "inspiration" and direct "infringement"?

- Could these lawsuits fundamentally change how all AI models are built?

- What potential solutions, like licensing deals, are being explored?

Follow my YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@chenran818 or listen to my music on Apple music, Spotify or other platforms: https://ffm.bio/chenran818