FTCの調査、GPT-6.1 Astraの出荷中止、常時稼働エージェントDotsの発表。規制・安全・製品という別々の棚の話が、実は同じ原理で結ばれます。AIの責任の単位が、固定された重みから、時間を通じて振る舞い続ける主体へ移りつつあるという仮説です。誰が何に責任を負うのかを問い直します。
Yahoo Finance (Daniel Howley), "FTC reportedly looking into whether OpenAI, Anthropic violated consumer protection laws" (2026-09-30) https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/article/ftc-reportedly-looking-into-whether-openai-anthropic-violated-consumer-protection-laws-185820887.html
PYMNTS, "OpenAI shelves new model due to safety worries" (2026) https://www.pymnts.com/news/artificial-intelligence/2026/openai-shelves-new-model-due-to-safety-worries/
TechCrunch, "OpenAI launches Dots, its bubbly agentic avatar" (2026-09-29) https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/29/openai-launches-dots-its-bubbly-agentic-avatar/
Source analysis article (ai-native-article) "責任の単位はモデルから振る舞う存在へ移る" https://kohuehara.xyz/ai-native-article/posts/ee8993c31729.md