Albuquerque is heading into a high-stakes December mayoral runoff after neither incumbent Tim Keller nor challenger Darren White secured the 50% majority required under the city charter. Keller led the first round with 36%, while White received 31%—meaning 64% of voters cast ballots against the incumbent, a clear sign of dissatisfaction despite his plurality lead. The 2013 charter amendment mandates a majority winner, forcing a runoff that now places both campaigns—and taxpayers—under new financial pressures.

The runoff is expected to cost the city nearly $2 million, and that figure does not include the additional public financing Keller qualified for under Albuquerque’s campaign rules. Keller has used public funding successfully in all three of his mayoral bids, including the upcoming runoff. When combined with the runoff’s operational costs, the total price tag for this election cycle approaches $3 million. White, who did not qualify for public funding, faces a significant financial disadvantage—one that Eddy argues could effectively determine the outcome before a single additional vote is cast.

This local contest also highlights broader problems in New Mexico’s election landscape. Due to constitutional changes in the early 2000s and the 2018 Local Election Act, municipalities can design their own systems, resulting in a fragmented “patchwork.” Some cities use plurality (Roswell), others use runoffs (Albuquerque, Rio Rancho, Gallup), and others use ranked-choice voting (RCV) (Santa Fe, Las Cruces). Rules around voter ID and campaign financing vary as well.

Although Eddy is not usually a supporter of RCV, he argues it would have produced a clearer reflection of voter sentiment in this election. Because 64% voted against Keller, an RCV system may have delivered a majority winner on election night, possibly Darren White. Supporters believe RCV ensures majority legitimacy and minimizes the impact of spoiler candidates, though critics cite its complexity and unpredictability.

OUTLINE OR TLDR OR LISTEN

Albuquerque Mayoral Election and Runoff

Election Results and Runoff Context

* Initial Vote Distribution: In the recent election, incumbent Mayor Tim Keller received 36% of the vote, while challenger Darren White received 31%.

* Voter Sentiment: 64% of voters cast ballots against Tim Keller, indicating a majority preferred another candidate.

* Runoff Requirement: Albuquerque’s city charter, amended in 2013, requires a candidate to secure a 50% majority to win. Since no candidate met this threshold, a runoff is necessary.

Financial Implications of the Runoff

* Runoff Cost: The city anticipates the December runoff will cost nearly $2 million.

* Public Financing: Tim Keller has successfully used public financing in his first two elections and again in this third election, including the upcoming runoff.

* Total Election Cost: Combining the runoff expenses with additional public financing, the total cost for this election cycle approaches $3 million.

* Candidate Funding Disparity: Darren White did not qualify for public financing. Eddy contends that this taxpayer-funded advantage for Keller will likely determine the election’s outcome.

Critique of New Mexico’s Election Systems

Inconsistency and Fragmentation

* Patchwork System: New Mexico’s municipal election landscape is described as a fragmented “patchwork” due to a 2003–2004 constitutional amendment and the 2018 Local Election Act, which allows cities to choose their own election frameworks.

* Varying Methods:

* Plurality: Roswell elects its mayor by plurality (simple top vote-getter wins).

* Runoffs: Albuquerque, Rio Rancho, and Gallup use runoff elections.

* Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV): Santa Fe and Las Cruces use RCV.

* Other Inconsistencies: Different municipalities have varying rules on issues such as voter ID and the availability of public financing (e.g., Albuquerque and Santa Fe offer it).

Arguments Regarding Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV)

* Speaker’s Stance: Eddy is not a general advocate for RCV but argues it would have been preferable in this specific Albuquerque election. With 64% of voters opposing Keller, Eddy believes another candidate, like Darren White, might have won on election night under RCV.

* How RCV Works:

* Voters rank candidates in order of preference (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.).

* If a candidate receives over 50% of first-choice votes, they win immediately.

* If not, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated.

* Voters who chose the eliminated candidate have their votes transferred to their second-choice pick.

* This process continues until one candidate achieves a majority.

* Potential Benefits of RCV:

* Ensures the winner has majority support.

* Reduces the impact of “spoiler” candidates.

* Can encourage more positive campaigning.

* Offers voters more choice and flexibility.

* Potential Drawbacks of RCV:

* It can be complex and confusing for voters.

* The outcome can be unpredictable.

* Adoption: RCV is used in places like New York City, Maine, and Alaska.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit rockoftalk.substack.com