The Generalship of Alexander the Great by J. F. C. Fuller - Chapter 1. THE BACKGROUND: The Rise of Macedonian Power - HQ Full Book.

J. F. C. Fuller’s The Generalship of Alexander the Great is a seminal work that meticulously examines the military genius of Alexander III of Macedon, one of history’s most celebrated conquerors. In Chapter 1, titled “The Background,” Fuller sets the stage for Alexander’s meteoric rise by exploring the political, social, and military landscape of Greece and Macedon in the 4th century BCE. This chapter provides a comprehensive foundation for understanding the conditions that shaped Alexander’s world and the legacy he inherited from his father, Philip II. Fuller’s analysis is both scholarly and engaging, weaving together historical events, philosophical influences, and strategic developments to contextualize Alexander’s achievements. Below is a description of this chapter, including short summaries of each subchapter.  

Overview of Chapter 1: The Background
Chapter 1 serves as a historical prelude, detailing the fragmented state of Greece, the decline of its city-states, and the rise of Macedon under Philip II. Fuller argues that Alexander’s success was not solely a product of his own brilliance but also the culmination of historical forces and reforms that preceded him. The chapter traces the decay of Greek autonomy, the intellectual currents that sought to unify the Hellenic world, and Philip’s transformative leadership, which laid the groundwork for Alexander’s empire. By examining key events such as the Sacred Wars and the Congress of Corinth, Fuller illustrates how Macedon emerged as a dominant power, setting the stage for Alexander’s conquests. The chapter is rich in historical detail, offering readers a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics that enabled Alexander’s extraordinary career.  

Subchapter Descriptions:   

Decay of the City-States  
This subchapter explores the decline of the Greek city-states, which had once been the pinnacle of political and cultural achievement. Fuller describes how, by the 4th century BCE, the city-states, including Athens and Sparta, were weakened by incessant warfare, economic instability, and internal strife. The Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE) had exhausted their resources and fractured their unity, leaving them vulnerable to external influence. Fuller highlights the shift from independent polis governance to a more chaotic landscape where rivalries and alliances destabilized the region. This decay created a power vacuum that Macedon, under Philip II, would exploit, setting the stage for a new era of centralized authority.    

Reforms of the Philosophers  
Here, Fuller examines the intellectual responses to Greece’s political fragmentation, focusing on the contributions of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. These thinkers proposed reforms to address the city-states’ decline, advocating for stronger governance and unity. Plato’s Republic envisioned an ideal state led by philosopher-kings, while Aristotle, who later tutored Alexander, emphasized practical governance and the study of politics. Fuller notes that these philosophical ideas influenced the broader Hellenic world, fostering a desire for a unified Greece capable of resisting external threats, such as Persia. This subchapter underscores the interplay between philosophy and politics, which shaped the ideological context of Alexander’s era.  

Philip II of Macedon  
This section introduces Philip II, Alexander’s father, as a pivotal figure in transforming Macedon from a peripheral kingdom into a dominant power. Fuller details Philip’s military and diplomatic innovations, including the creation of the Macedonian phalanx, a highly disciplined infantry formation, and his strategic use of alliances and marriages. Philip’s reforms strengthened Macedon’s economy, military, and political cohesion, enabling him to exert influence over Greece. Fuller portrays Philip as a visionary leader whose ambition to unite Greece under Macedonian hegemony provided Alexander with the tools and opportunities to pursue his conquests. This subchapter emphasizes Philip’s foundational role in Alexander’s success.  

Amphipolis and the First Sacred War  
Fuller analyzes Philip’s early expansionist moves, focusing on the capture of Amphipolis (357 BCE) and his involvement in the First Sacred War (356–346 BCE). Amphipolis, a strategically vital city, gave Macedon control over valuable resources and access to the Aegean Sea. The First Sacred War, centered on control of the Delphic Oracle, allowed Philip to intervene in Greek affairs, positioning himself as a defender of religious sanctity. Fuller highlights how these events showcased Philip’s cunning diplomacy and military prowess, consolidating his influence in northern Greece and setting a precedent for Macedonian intervention in Greek conflicts.  

Isocrates’ Panhellenic Programme  
This subchapter discusses the ideas of Isocrates, a prominent Athenian rhetorician who advocated for a unified Greece under a single leader to confront Persia. Isocrates’ Panegyricus and Philippus called for a Panhellenic crusade against the Persian Empire, with Philip as the ideal leader. Fuller explains how Isocrates’ vision aligned with Philip’s ambitions, providing ideological support for Macedonian hegemony. Although Isocrates’ programme was not fully realized in his lifetime, it influenced the rhetoric of unity that Alexander later adopted in his campaigns. This section underscores the role of intellectual advocacy in shaping political and military objectives.  

Byzantium and the Second Sacred War  
Fuller examines Philip’s further consolidation of power through his campaigns against Byzantium and his role in the Second Sacred War (340–338 BCE). The siege of Byzantium (340 BCE) demonstrated Macedon’s growing naval ambitions and strategic reach, though it was not entirely successful. The Second Sacred War, another conflict over Delphi, allowed Philip to deepen his influence in central Greece. Fuller details how Philip’s victory at the Battle of Chaeronea (338 BCE) during this war crushed Theban and Athenian resistance, cementing Macedonian dominance. This subchapter illustrates Philip’s relentless pursuit of control over Greece, paving the way for the Congress of Corinth.  

The Congress of Corinth  
The final subchapter covers the Congress of Corinth (337 BCE), where Philip established the League of Corinth, a coalition of Greek states under Macedonian leadership. Fuller describes how Philip used the league to formalize his hegemony, compelling the city-states to pledge loyalty and contribute to a planned invasion of Persia. The congress marked the culmination of Philip’s efforts to unify Greece, albeit through coercion. Fuller notes that the league’s structure provided Alexander with a unified Greek force for his campaigns, highlighting the continuity between Philip’s and Alexander’s ambitions. This section concludes the chapter by emphasizing the historical significance of Philip’s achievements as the foundation for Alexander’s empire.  

Conclusion  
Chapter 1 of The Generalship of Alexander the Great is a masterful exposition of the historical forces that shaped Alexander’s world. Fuller’s detailed analysis of the decay of the city-states, philosophical reforms, Philip’s leadership, and key events like the Sacred Wars and the Congress of Corinth provides a rich context for understanding Alexander’s generalship. By highlighting the interplay of political, intellectual, and military developments, Fuller demonstrates that Alexander’s success was built on the foundations laid by his predecessors, particularly Philip II. This chapter is essential reading for anyone seeking to appreciate the complexities of Alexander’s era and the strategic brilliance that defined his conquests.  

#AlexanderTheGreat #Macedon #PhilipII #GreekHistory #CityStates #HellenicUnity #SacredWars #CongressOfCorinth #MilitaryHistory #AncientGreece #Panhellenic #Isocrates #Philosophers #Amphipolis #Byzantium #MacedonianPhalanx #GreekDecline #HistoricalContext #FullerAnalysis #EmpireBuilding