Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share ‘Almost’ Never-Ending Battle
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
‘Almost’ Never-Ending Battle
TRANSCRIPT
The wagons continue to circle around Fr. James Martin and his homoheresy, and we have arrived at this point of which Martin is merely the point man because the reality is that there are really two bodies of baptized Catholics in the United States, each claiming to hold and teach the authentic faith. One is orthodox; the other is heterodox. What we have is a practical schism, a functioning day-in-day-out schism that cannot go on indefinitely.
Martin with his homoheresy is the frontman for the heterodox side, which for the moment does have the numbers and much of the power in the Church, but that will have all evaporated within the next generation, as their spiritual suicide is already in full-blown mode.
Everywhere he goes, Martin gets opposition in multiple forms, protests or petitions, for example. Before he ever arrives, faithful Catholics, still in the minority, start getting in polite communication with the hosting venue, asking that they disinvite him for his dissent and heresy. A recent example is the invitation by Spring Hill College in Alabama to Martin to deliver the 2018 commencement address. Spring Hill is a small Jesuit college with a very liberal — meaning whacked-out point of view, or more precisely not actually liberal but heretical. Why parents would want to pay the $33,000-a-year tuition bill for a supposed Catholic education is pretty puzzling, but we digress.
When the Coalition of Concerned Catholics wrote a very polite letter to the school asking them to disinvite Martin, here in part was the response they got. Hold on, because it's typical modernist crazy talk with our brief commentary:
"As the oldest Catholic college in the Southeast and the third-oldest Jesuit college in our nation, Spring Hill College has a 188-year history of speaking out and acting in favor of justice for those whose voices may have been marginalized."
[Social Justice 101: Hey Spring Hill, not all marginalized voices have a right to be heard because of the wickedness they support. Do you advocate for slaveholders or child pornographers? Aren't they marginalized? Yes, they are because some positions in fact merit being marginalized.]
"We are comfortable in having Fr. Martin serve as our commencement speaker. Cardinals Blase Cupich, Seán O'Malley and Joseph Tobin have all publicly endorsed Fr. Martin and his work."
[So what? This is another typical heterodox argument method — get some other big name, heresy-supporting names behind you and trumpet them. This is a false appeal to authority. These men also support sacrilegious Holy Communion. Appealing to these co-conspirators of Martin's in trying to reshape the Church only bolsters the argument against Martin.]
"We agree with Cdl. Cupich who said Fr. Martin 'has given his life for the service of the church. He's been very dedicated, he's well-respected.' The cardinal also said, 'I think those movements of not inviting or disinviting him were very unfortunate,' and our College agrees."
[Spring Hill's quoting of Cupich's support is another false appeal to authority. Why? Because Cupich is wrong. Martin has done nothing of the sort. He has given his life not for the service of the Church but for its destruction — just as we imagine Spring Hill has in malforming their own students in the Catholic faith, yet living as parasites on the Church, trafficking in the name "Catholic."]
"There is room in our Church for honest differences in how true followers of Christ understand and adhere to His teaching."
[Not when those differences are actually over the teaching itself. Disagreeing with the actual teachings and portraying that dissent as just a difference of opinion is indeed not honest but the very definition of dishonest.]
"All of humanity is created in the image and likeness of God, and Fr. Martin invites those of differing perspectives to explore opportunities for increasing understanding through respectful dialogue."
[Is there ever a missive written by the modernist heretic crowd that does not include an appeal to dialogue? All they want to do is talk, talk, talk. In reality, all they want to do is pervert, twist and destroy — all through the appearance of "respectful dialogue." We will remind the viewer, here, that we issued a public invitation a couple of months ago to Fr. Martin to "dialog" publicly about his "differing perspective, but the man pushing homoheresy — has been forbidden by his superiors from revealing his own sexuality because it would completely reveal the truth of his propaganda — has so far not responded.]
"That approach most definitely is consistent with the expectations of the contemplative discernment processes espoused in Jesuit teaching."
[Gotta say it: Shut up! Stop draping your heresy in the cloak of appealing to "discernment" and contemplation. Jesuit teaching, up until recently, never envisioned the acceptance and blessing of sodomy. But then again, St. Ignatius never envisioned his order being overrun by emasculated, effeminate sodomites using his sainted name to try and convince people that their evil is actually good.]
"We sincerely hope that, while we respect your position and your prerogative to hold it, you will also respect ours and that of the cardinals of the Church who have been outspoken supporters of Fr. Martin's views."
[Again, with the false appeal to authority, notice how polite the modernist crowd always is, always very respectful and concerned sounding, just like the Nazi guards politely and respectfully helping the Jews to board the trains, lending them a hand getting up on to the death transports.]
If you are in the minority Catholic Church right now, suffer through this passion. Pray, work and plant yourself firmly at the foot of the Cross, just as Our Blessed Mother did and St. John. Jesus Himself was betrayed by His own hand-picked followers and the religious leaders of His day. They all talked a good game as well — they were all about dialogue and so forth. But there was not a drop of goodwill in them, and for it, they were more than likely damned.
Martin and all his cardinal supporters bear a striking resemblance to Judas and the Sanhedrin. Judas had a lot of support and backing from the influential elders like Caiaphas. Even their rationalizations strike a very similar sounding note: "Better that one man should die than a whole nation perish." Better that one teaching be "re-interpreted" than a whole class of people be offended.
As these public defenses of Martin continue to mount, they have the effect of revealing the practical schism in the Church, but they also point to the truth that they cannot sustain themselves, and what is today the minority Church will be the only Church remaining. So tick tock, Spring Hill College and Fr. Martin and all those cardinal supporters. Every dog has its day.
Wait patiently and continue to act. God is in control. Pray for the modernist crowd that they see the light before they be plunged into eternal darkness.
View all episodes
By Church Militant
4.7
325325 ratings
TRANSCRIPT
The wagons continue to circle around Fr. James Martin and his homoheresy, and we have arrived at this point of which Martin is merely the point man because the reality is that there are really two bodies of baptized Catholics in the United States, each claiming to hold and teach the authentic faith. One is orthodox; the other is heterodox. What we have is a practical schism, a functioning day-in-day-out schism that cannot go on indefinitely.
Martin with his homoheresy is the frontman for the heterodox side, which for the moment does have the numbers and much of the power in the Church, but that will have all evaporated within the next generation, as their spiritual suicide is already in full-blown mode.
Everywhere he goes, Martin gets opposition in multiple forms, protests or petitions, for example. Before he ever arrives, faithful Catholics, still in the minority, start getting in polite communication with the hosting venue, asking that they disinvite him for his dissent and heresy. A recent example is the invitation by Spring Hill College in Alabama to Martin to deliver the 2018 commencement address. Spring Hill is a small Jesuit college with a very liberal — meaning whacked-out point of view, or more precisely not actually liberal but heretical. Why parents would want to pay the $33,000-a-year tuition bill for a supposed Catholic education is pretty puzzling, but we digress.
When the Coalition of Concerned Catholics wrote a very polite letter to the school asking them to disinvite Martin, here in part was the response they got. Hold on, because it's typical modernist crazy talk with our brief commentary:
"As the oldest Catholic college in the Southeast and the third-oldest Jesuit college in our nation, Spring Hill College has a 188-year history of speaking out and acting in favor of justice for those whose voices may have been marginalized."
[Social Justice 101: Hey Spring Hill, not all marginalized voices have a right to be heard because of the wickedness they support. Do you advocate for slaveholders or child pornographers? Aren't they marginalized? Yes, they are because some positions in fact merit being marginalized.]
"We are comfortable in having Fr. Martin serve as our commencement speaker. Cardinals Blase Cupich, Seán O'Malley and Joseph Tobin have all publicly endorsed Fr. Martin and his work."
[So what? This is another typical heterodox argument method — get some other big name, heresy-supporting names behind you and trumpet them. This is a false appeal to authority. These men also support sacrilegious Holy Communion. Appealing to these co-conspirators of Martin's in trying to reshape the Church only bolsters the argument against Martin.]
"We agree with Cdl. Cupich who said Fr. Martin 'has given his life for the service of the church. He's been very dedicated, he's well-respected.' The cardinal also said, 'I think those movements of not inviting or disinviting him were very unfortunate,' and our College agrees."
[Spring Hill's quoting of Cupich's support is another false appeal to authority. Why? Because Cupich is wrong. Martin has done nothing of the sort. He has given his life not for the service of the Church but for its destruction — just as we imagine Spring Hill has in malforming their own students in the Catholic faith, yet living as parasites on the Church, trafficking in the name "Catholic."]
"There is room in our Church for honest differences in how true followers of Christ understand and adhere to His teaching."
[Not when those differences are actually over the teaching itself. Disagreeing with the actual teachings and portraying that dissent as just a difference of opinion is indeed not honest but the very definition of dishonest.]
"All of humanity is created in the image and likeness of God, and Fr. Martin invites those of differing perspectives to explore opportunities for increasing understanding through respectful dialogue."
[Is there ever a missive written by the modernist heretic crowd that does not include an appeal to dialogue? All they want to do is talk, talk, talk. In reality, all they want to do is pervert, twist and destroy — all through the appearance of "respectful dialogue." We will remind the viewer, here, that we issued a public invitation a couple of months ago to Fr. Martin to "dialog" publicly about his "differing perspective, but the man pushing homoheresy — has been forbidden by his superiors from revealing his own sexuality because it would completely reveal the truth of his propaganda — has so far not responded.]
"That approach most definitely is consistent with the expectations of the contemplative discernment processes espoused in Jesuit teaching."
[Gotta say it: Shut up! Stop draping your heresy in the cloak of appealing to "discernment" and contemplation. Jesuit teaching, up until recently, never envisioned the acceptance and blessing of sodomy. But then again, St. Ignatius never envisioned his order being overrun by emasculated, effeminate sodomites using his sainted name to try and convince people that their evil is actually good.]
"We sincerely hope that, while we respect your position and your prerogative to hold it, you will also respect ours and that of the cardinals of the Church who have been outspoken supporters of Fr. Martin's views."
[Again, with the false appeal to authority, notice how polite the modernist crowd always is, always very respectful and concerned sounding, just like the Nazi guards politely and respectfully helping the Jews to board the trains, lending them a hand getting up on to the death transports.]
If you are in the minority Catholic Church right now, suffer through this passion. Pray, work and plant yourself firmly at the foot of the Cross, just as Our Blessed Mother did and St. John. Jesus Himself was betrayed by His own hand-picked followers and the religious leaders of His day. They all talked a good game as well — they were all about dialogue and so forth. But there was not a drop of goodwill in them, and for it, they were more than likely damned.
Martin and all his cardinal supporters bear a striking resemblance to Judas and the Sanhedrin. Judas had a lot of support and backing from the influential elders like Caiaphas. Even their rationalizations strike a very similar sounding note: "Better that one man should die than a whole nation perish." Better that one teaching be "re-interpreted" than a whole class of people be offended.
As these public defenses of Martin continue to mount, they have the effect of revealing the practical schism in the Church, but they also point to the truth that they cannot sustain themselves, and what is today the minority Church will be the only Church remaining. So tick tock, Spring Hill College and Fr. Martin and all those cardinal supporters. Every dog has its day.
Wait patiently and continue to act. God is in control. Pray for the modernist crowd that they see the light before they be plunged into eternal darkness.