We interview Titus Gebel, the Founder, President and CEO of Free Private Cities Inc.
Free Private Cities is working towards building new, greenfield cities using a model of individual bilateral contracts between each citizen and the city owner/operator.
In his book, "Free Private Cities: Making Governments Compete for You," Titus describes why and how Free Private Cities should be developed.
Use hashtag #ana025 to reference this episode in a tweet, post, or comment
View full show notes at http://anarchitecturepodcast.com/ana025.
----more----
Intro
- The Free Private Cities Concept
A simple idea, with profound consequencesAutonomy from the host nationReal World prototypes: Hong Kong, Shenzhen, SingaporeUnique forms of urban development- Patrik Schumacher - Market Based Urban Order
Open to market experimentation- Competing service provider models
Incentives to cover maintenance costsBook: Free Private Cities: Making Governments Compete for You by Titus GebelDiscussion
- What is a Free Private City (FPC)?
- A concept to make governments compete for you
Rights and obligations of citizen and service provider are captured in an individual contractA contract should not be changed by only one partyThe Monaco realization - good governance makes political action unnecessaryLocation location location!- Is a weak or friendly sponsor government a geographical feature?
Location factors -proximity to infrastructureaccess to tradetechnology can improve desirability of remote locations and seasteadsHow does the process get started?Proposals from candidate countriesLegal autonomy is the hardest partThe sales pitch - Special Economic ZonesSeeking finance: $100m opens a lot of doorsAt some point, they will hopefully compete for usExamples - Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Macao- More than 4,000 Special Economic Zones (SEZ's) and Special Administrative Regions (SAR's) already exist
SEZ's create wealth for the surrounding regionsHow do you integrate existing occupants?- Concept is based on 100% voluntary participation
Ideal is to start on uninhabited territoryExisting occupantsOffer free/discounted citizenshipCompensation for displacementHow does property ownership work?- Everything is conceivable
City operator is a for-profit entityOperator would likely own the land, sell parcels to raise fundsOption agreements or partnerships with existing landownersLease model - less likely but also possibleUser fees alone may not be sufficientPush vs. Pull development- Start small, organic growth
Some master planning is needed for easements, etc.Patrik Schumacher - zoning for aesthetics in city center"The Freak Zone" in outer areas - little or no zoningLighter touch, use based zoning- Height and noise restrictions alone can determine uses
Opportunities for more unique urban formsPatrik Schumacher - Market Based Urban OrderWe don't know, so we want to try it outDifferent districts with different rulesHow do you manage change?- Noise threshold and other development rights can be sold
Multiple competing operators / providers within one city?- This is possible for certain services
Provision of security should be a monopolyTransaction costs too high"I'm happy if people can prove me wrong"Competing security within subdevelopments, with subsidiarity to the operatorSan Francisco private police forceCity operator as an intermediary- "Social contract" is a contract between each individual and every other individual
People think they own city assets because they pay taxesThe FPC contract model clarifies the relationshipIn a FPC, other citizens can't interfere with your contract with the operatorMuch better protection for individual libertiesRepresentative systems are susceptible to lobbying, cronyism, power playsTaxes don't entitle you to any servicesFPC operator is liable for malperformance of contract - compensation for poor security performance- Joe's house was broken into
- Only role of the police was an official report for the insurance claim
Monaco car vandalism - direct access to the ministerMore cameras, and more screening of immigrants"If you are not punishing people for doing bad things, they will do it again"Cameras and police presence in an FPC - not as creepy as when a government does it - is it a surveillance state if there is no state?There are always trade offsIf you are not providing effective security, you will go out of businessPeople come to Monaco because the cameras are there, keeping them safeA cruise ship captain can legally abuse his passengers - but he treats them like customersHow would disputes between a citizen and the operator be adjudicated?- Third party arbitration, special courts
No different than any major construction contractMinimum payment to arbitrators is $1,200 - not feasible for small claimsSmall claims tribunals a potential solutionEasier in theory than in practiceOther means of citizen involvement in city management- It's not so important who owns the city operator, as long as the contracts are enforced
Some cities might require citizens to purchase a share of ownershipCooperatives are possibleVarious councils can be formed, but cannot violate citizen contracts or force changes to the contractPublic space is one service offered by the operator- Kicking someone out of a city means preventing them from using public space.
Cities who expel criminals from public and private spaces will end up looking less like a police stateRestitution to victims- Operator makes citizen whole, criminal owes the operator compensation
Keep punishment/imprisonment to a minimum, prefer expulsion and compensation to victimsMultiple laboratories to see what really worksProjects on the horizon
- Subscribe to FPC newsletter for updates
Buy the book (link below)Links/Resources
- Free Private Cities Website
- The Book: Free Private Cities: Making Governments Compete for You by Titus Gebel
- Listen to the Audiobook for free at Mises.org
Subscribe to the NewsletterPatrik Schumacher- Free Market Urban Order (YouTube)
Architecture's Contribution to the Progress of Freedom, Patrik Schumacher 2019 (YouTube)Episodes Mentioned
- ana011: Patrik Schumacher (3 of 4) | The Interview
ana023: Strong Towns for Libertarians | Chuck Marohn InterviewContact:
Tweet us: @anarchitecturep
Follow:
Website: http://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/anarchitecturepodcast/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/anarchitecturep/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/anarchitecturep/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/AnarchitecturePodcst
Minds: https://www.minds.com/AnarchitecturePodcast
Subscribe:
iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/au/podcast/anarchitecture/id1091252412
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWELM_zTl7tXLgT-rDKpSvg
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5pepyQfA25PBz6bzKzlynf?si=4UiD6cLkR6Wd26wJC4S4YQ
Podbean: https://anarchitecture.podbean.com/
Stitcher: http://www.stitcher.com/s?fid=85082&refid=stpr
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/MIq2dOnSaTOP/
RSS (all posts): http://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/feed/
RSS (Podcasts only): http://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/feed/podcast/
Other Subscription Options
Support:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/anarchitecturepodcast
Bitbacker.io: https://bitbacker.io/user/anarchitecture/
Steemit: https://steemit.com/@anarchitecture
Donate Bitcoin (BTC): 32cPbM7j5rxRu1KUaXGtoxsqFQNWD696p7