Send us a text

The theological frameworks we embrace don't just shape our Sunday morning experiences—they fundamentally influence global politics, military decisions, and international alliances. Today we're diving deep into how dispensationalism—a theological perspective developed in the 1800s—has created a distorted lens through which many Christians view Israel, Middle Eastern conflicts, and American foreign policy.

At its core, this theological distortion artificially divides what Scripture unites. The New Testament consistently portrays one covenant people united in Christ, yet dispensationalism insists on maintaining separation between Israel and the Church. As Paul writes in Romans 9:6, "Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel," and in Galatians 3:29, "If you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to the promise." These passages fundamentally challenge the notion that the modern nation-state of Israel holds a special theological status separate from the Church.

The consequences stretch far beyond biblical interpretation. This theology has fostered blind political allegiance to Israel under the mistaken belief that supporting its government equates to fulfilling biblical prophecy. It has normalized Middle Eastern conflict as somehow necessary or predetermined rather than tragic. Most concerningly, it has allowed believers to overlook justice issues in service to perceived prophetic timelines. We must recognize when we've elevated national identity above Christ's cross. When our theology leads us to prioritize land boundaries over human dignity, prophecy charts over compassionate engagement, or political allegiance over biblical justice, we've strayed from the gospel's central message of reconciliation. Whether you've embraced dispensationalism or questioned it, I invite you to examine how your theological framework shapes your view of global events, and to return to seeing the world through the lens of Christ's unifying work.

Support the show