This is your Beijing Bytes: US-China Tech War Updates podcast.
Hi listeners, Ting here, hacking through the latest circuitry on Beijing Bytes. Buckle up, because the last two weeks in the US-China tech war have been a wild ride—think cyber shootouts, regulatory curveballs, and a few AI bombshells big enough to shake Wall Street.
Let’s dive right into the action. Top of the headlines, Italian police just arrested Xu Zewei, a notorious Chinese hacker, at the US government’s request. Xu and his cohort Zhang Yu are accused of unleashing the infamous Hafnium, aka Silk Typhoon, hacks on Microsoft Exchange servers. This wasn’t your run-of-the-mill phishing attempt—we’re talking breaches at over 60,000 US entities, targeting everything from COVID-19 research at top universities to sensitive business email troves. US authorities say the Chinese Ministry of State Security directly orchestrated some of these attacks, and the trail goes through Shanghai Powerock Network, Xu’s employer. The DOJ sees this as a win, but Google’s John Hultquist warns: With dozens of teams still out there, this won’t slow the cyber espionage treadmill—though it might make the next Xu think twice.
Meanwhile, the US just went DEFCON 2 on advanced chip exports. Nvidia’s H100 and AMD’s MI300X GPUs were already China no-gos, but now the US Commerce Department is extending licensing requirements to Malaysia and Thailand. Why? Chinese firms like DeepSeek have been using shell companies there to skim chips despite embargoes. Malaysia’s trade minister, Tengku Zafrul Aziz, even set up a task force to audit every Nvidia GPU shipment—imagine digital customs officers with X-ray vision. Singapore, too, is prosecuting middlemen for shipping $390 million in chips to DeepSeek, leaving the whole Southeast Asian supply chain jumpy. This is the tech version of whack-a-mole—regulators plug one leak, another springs somewhere else.
If you’re wondering how all this regulatory crossfire is hitting industry, look no further than the AI sector. DeepSeek’s budget-friendly, high-performing AI models sparked a trillion-dollar market panic in the US back in January, with tech stocks briefly in freefall. Washington responded by evaluating DeepSeek for national security risks, while Beijing quietly seized the passports of DeepSeek’s top engineers—a not-so-subtle way of saying “you’re not leaving anytime soon.” Copyright is now the new battleground, as US lawmakers weigh rules that could hamper American AI labs more than Chinese ones, since Beijing has zero qualms about hoovering up copyrighted US data for training.
Let’s not forget policy: The US Department of Justice’s Data Security Program kicks in tomorrow, July 9th, enforcing the toughest rules yet on international data transfers—especially to China and other “countries of concern.” Tech companies scrambling to comply could face severe penalties if they slip up now that the 90-day grace period is over.
Zooming out, experts at UBS predict that with the US-China trade truce expiring in August, stricter penalties could further split global tech markets—rewarding compliant Western firms and squeezing those reliant on Chinese demand. If that’s not enough, new FEOC rules deny US energy tax credits to projects using too much Chinese content, tightening the financial vice on tech imports.
So where does this all lead? Strategic decoupling is accelerating, and both sides are doubling down. For the US, that means more export controls, compliance crackdowns, and policy innovation. For China, it’s about turbocharging domestic alternatives, outflanking sanctions, and occasionally, playing a little global chess with its hacker pawns.
That wraps another byte-sized burst of the US-China tech rivalry. Thanks for tuning in, listeners—don’t forget to subscribe for your next slice of cyber intrigue. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta