
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Join Harry and Philip as they continue their analysis of dictatorship! This week, we turn to midcentury Portugal to apply the "stationary bandit" theory from our last Bird's Eye.
Was António de Oliveira Salazar, the autocratic ruler of Portugal from 1932 to 1968, an example of the stationary bandit? How well does Olson's theory hold up in a historical study of dictatorship? Listen and find out!
--
Visit our website and subscribe to our newsletter!To comment on this episode, click here!To listen to written articles from Spectacles read aloud, click here!Follow us on Twitter!--
Further Reading--
Table of Contents00:00 - Intro & Housekeeping
00:32 - The common human longing for enlightened dictatorship
01:41 - Today's subject: Salazar
02:21 - Recap
05:50 - A brief bio of Salazar
09:40 - How was Olson right?
14:40 - What did he miss?
25:41 - The feasibility of autocracy in a globalized world
29:57 - Don't be deceived by the appeals of dictatorship
33:20 - Signing off
By Spectacles Media5
66 ratings
Join Harry and Philip as they continue their analysis of dictatorship! This week, we turn to midcentury Portugal to apply the "stationary bandit" theory from our last Bird's Eye.
Was António de Oliveira Salazar, the autocratic ruler of Portugal from 1932 to 1968, an example of the stationary bandit? How well does Olson's theory hold up in a historical study of dictatorship? Listen and find out!
--
Visit our website and subscribe to our newsletter!To comment on this episode, click here!To listen to written articles from Spectacles read aloud, click here!Follow us on Twitter!--
Further Reading--
Table of Contents00:00 - Intro & Housekeeping
00:32 - The common human longing for enlightened dictatorship
01:41 - Today's subject: Salazar
02:21 - Recap
05:50 - A brief bio of Salazar
09:40 - How was Olson right?
14:40 - What did he miss?
25:41 - The feasibility of autocracy in a globalized world
29:57 - Don't be deceived by the appeals of dictatorship
33:20 - Signing off