In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the intricate legal and PR dynamics of the Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni case. The discussion explores the potential for the case to go to trial and the PR implications for both parties, particularly focusing on social media's role. Hoeg examines legal aspects, including anti-SLAPP laws, and critiques a New York Times article for its coverage. Allegations of bad faith, ethical obligations, and internal communications are analyzed, alongside a comparison of media treatment between Lively and Amber Heard. The episode also touches on workplace ethics, the impact of harassment allegations, and the challenges of celebrity image management.

https://archive.ph/0CVoc#selection-4831.20-4831.28

https://archive.ph/VghiA

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25473284-bi-https-media/?

https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/1700/1701/

https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/1800/1802/

https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/1900/1902/

https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/300/305/

https://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/c-c-p-section-425-16/

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/blake-lively-sues-justin-baldoni-sexual-harassment-it-ends-with-us-1236097463/

https://x.com/spiritualshift_/status/1876836375720612144

https://thenewfeminist.co.uk/2025/01/people-really-want-to-hate-on-women-what-the-backlash-against-blake-lively-for-her-justin-baldoni-complaint-warns-of-modern-misogyny/

(0:00) Introduction and greetings

(2:32) Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldini discussion

(4:10) Sponsor acknowledgment and thanking supporters

(5:11) PR battles, media manipulation, and trust

(7:51) Influence of PR on social media

(9:22) Media incentives and listener feedback

(12:09) Legal aspects, anti-SLAPP laws, and New York Times article analysis

(24:51) Anonymous defendants and journalistic integrity

(28:32) Defamation, libel, and social media controversies

(45:57) Organic vs. orchestrated campaigns and defamation case requirements

(50:28) Internal conflicts in production and role of Stephanie Jones

(57:34) Allegations of inappropriate behavior and media responsibility

(1:03:05) Depp v Heard comparison and defamation suits

(1:07:22) Anti-SLAPP law and jurisdictional impacts

(1:12:27) Film completion, hostile takeovers, and retaliation claims

(1:18:04) Federal court considerations and PR battle reliability

(1:23:07) Creative control and internal communications in film production

(1:27:34) Legal vs. ethical media reporting and premiere issues

(1:30:16) Personal impact and abuse of harassment allegations

(1:34:27) Fame's impact and threats of additional lawsuits

(1:36:12) Sponsor: Sandy's gifted memberships

(1:37:26) Hollywood PR ethics and lawsuit jurisdiction details

(1:47:19) Lawsuit messaging, film vision, and production challenges

(1:56:15) Script alterations and production impact

(2:01:46) Allegations against Lively and legal representation importance

(2:09:04) Writing process and safety on set

(2:13:37) Double standards and breastfeeding incident claims

(2:17:03) Demands, production resumption, and editing involvement

(2:25:29) Producer credit disputes and Sony's actor management

(2:30:48) Losing Control

(2:34:03) The Value of Conflict Resolution

(2:38:54) Premieres and Church Basements

(2:49:07) Who is this lawsuit about?

(4:15:36) Circumventing NDA?

(2:52:35) Stephanie Jones

(2:56:33) The New York Times

(3:02:43) Libel

(3:12:47) False Light

(3:16:35) Contract Law?

(3:21:51) Concluding Thoughts and Thank Yous