The Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively case took a major turn when the $400 million countersuit was dismissed. What began as a scorched-earth strategy, with a separate website and promises of transparency, quickly shifted when the judge struck nearly 300 pages from the record, calling it a publicity stunt.

Patience has disappeared in today’s world. People expect instant replies to texts and emails, entire seasons released at once, and faster games with pitch clocks. That same impatience is showing up in this lawsuit.

Social media rewarded quick PR moves, but the legal filings could not meet the strict pleading requirements of Rule 9. A lawsuit cannot be a fishing expedition. Facts must be pled with enough detail even to move forward, and that is where the countersuit fell apart.

Blake Lively’s deposition created new drama when Baldoni attended in person, raising questions about power moves and intimidation. Subpoenas have been issued to small YouTubers, and there is speculation about who is covering the mounting legal fees.

With a trial date set for March 2026, both sides face a choice between a long public battle or a quiet settlement behind closed doors.

For now, the headlines have taken the back seat, but the case is far from over.

WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD.

Connect with us:
TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw
Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw
LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law

Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com