
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Sean is joined by brothers Ryan and Kevin from 'The Almost Presidents Podcast' to discuss one of the most famous almost-Presidents, Bobby Kennedy, via the film Bobby (2006).
Regarding the no-politics rule for this podcast: Sean decides you can discuss politics as a way of contextualising the film, as long as no-one declares a position.
My Guests: Check them out at https://anchor.fm/ryan-johnson866
Discussion Points:
-Sean thinks the guys-who-do-drugs should go.
-The pain of seeing Stanley Yelnats (kind of) in the line of fire!
-The reason Emilio Estevez is in this film.
-The dynamic between the kitchen staff.
-The powerful ending of the film.
-The assassinations of the 1960's and their impact in the United States.
-Bobby Kennedy never had the chance to "let anyone down as President".
-Alternative History.
-Doctor Seuss.
-Sean tries not to embarrass himself by trying to understand the American Political System.
-Sean was thinking of Tom Welling.
Raised Questions:
-Is Kevin right, are there too many characters?
-Why did this film make so little impact, given the star studded cast?
-Do you want a spin-off with Ashton Kutcher's character?
-Do films set in the 1960's need drug scenes?
-Would you marry Elijah Wood?
-Hass Bobby Kennedy been mythologised?
-Why has there never been a film about Prime Minister Spencer Perceval-the only British PM ever to be assassinated?
-Did you want characters that didn't support Bobby Kennedy?
-Would Bobby Kennedy even been the Presidential nominee that year?
-Are the Kennedy's the Royal Family of America?
Thanks for listening!
Twitter: @YourselfReview
Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
4.6
1111 ratings
Sean is joined by brothers Ryan and Kevin from 'The Almost Presidents Podcast' to discuss one of the most famous almost-Presidents, Bobby Kennedy, via the film Bobby (2006).
Regarding the no-politics rule for this podcast: Sean decides you can discuss politics as a way of contextualising the film, as long as no-one declares a position.
My Guests: Check them out at https://anchor.fm/ryan-johnson866
Discussion Points:
-Sean thinks the guys-who-do-drugs should go.
-The pain of seeing Stanley Yelnats (kind of) in the line of fire!
-The reason Emilio Estevez is in this film.
-The dynamic between the kitchen staff.
-The powerful ending of the film.
-The assassinations of the 1960's and their impact in the United States.
-Bobby Kennedy never had the chance to "let anyone down as President".
-Alternative History.
-Doctor Seuss.
-Sean tries not to embarrass himself by trying to understand the American Political System.
-Sean was thinking of Tom Welling.
Raised Questions:
-Is Kevin right, are there too many characters?
-Why did this film make so little impact, given the star studded cast?
-Do you want a spin-off with Ashton Kutcher's character?
-Do films set in the 1960's need drug scenes?
-Would you marry Elijah Wood?
-Hass Bobby Kennedy been mythologised?
-Why has there never been a film about Prime Minister Spencer Perceval-the only British PM ever to be assassinated?
-Did you want characters that didn't support Bobby Kennedy?
-Would Bobby Kennedy even been the Presidential nominee that year?
-Are the Kennedy's the Royal Family of America?
Thanks for listening!
Twitter: @YourselfReview
Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.