
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski analyze Boehringer v. Collins, a case testing whether a veteran can trigger AMA’s continuous pursuit rules by filing a supplemental claim within a year of a legacy Board decision. They break down the statutory argument under Section 2(x) of the AMA, the government’s position on finality, and the broader implications for effective dates in a dual-system world. A must-listen for those tracking how AMA and legacy rules intersect.
For more information, visit our websites at cck-law.com and abkveteranslaw.com
By CCK Law4.5
2222 ratings
In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski analyze Boehringer v. Collins, a case testing whether a veteran can trigger AMA’s continuous pursuit rules by filing a supplemental claim within a year of a legacy Board decision. They break down the statutory argument under Section 2(x) of the AMA, the government’s position on finality, and the broader implications for effective dates in a dual-system world. A must-listen for those tracking how AMA and legacy rules intersect.
For more information, visit our websites at cck-law.com and abkveteranslaw.com

16,400 Listeners

87,758 Listeners

112,904 Listeners

56,561 Listeners

32,371 Listeners

368,689 Listeners

99,119 Listeners

6,444 Listeners

3,895 Listeners

16,088 Listeners