A Note On The Additional Verses:

• We value Scripture as originally written by Spirit-inspired authors, so we should be cautious about later additions. 

• The primary issue with Mark 16:9–20 is textual: these verses are absent from the earliest manuscripts, unlike the minor word-level variants we typically see.

• The style and theological emphasis of the longer ending feel unlike Mark and read like a stitched summary from the other Gospels, which was likely an attempt to soften an abrupt ending.

• Two plausible conclusions remain: either Mark originally ended at 16:8, or an original ending was lost/never completed; either way, we must not add to or subtract from what God has preserved. 

• We lose nothing essential by stopping at 16:8: God has given us the full counsel of the four Gospels (and Acts) to anchor resurrection faith without leaning on uncertain material.

We'll be back for a series through Philippians in February 2026!

Learn more about us at EkklesiaChurches.org