On November 3, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Borden v. United States. The question before the court was whether the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act encompasses crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness.<br />Joining us to discuss this case’s oral argument is Kent Scheidegger. Mr. Scheidegger is the Legal Director & General Counsel at Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

On November 3, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Borden v. United States. The question before the court was whether the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act encompasses crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness.Joining us to discuss this case’s oral argument is Kent Scheidegger. Mr. Scheidegger is the Legal Director & General Counsel at Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

On November 3, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Borden v. United States. The question before the court was whether the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act encompasses crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness.<br>Joining us to discuss this case’s oral argument is Kent Scheidegger. Mr. Scheidegger is the Legal Director &amp; General Counsel at Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

Borden v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

News

Politics

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law &amp; Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

Share Borden v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Sign up to save your podcasts

Borden v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Borden v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

More shows like SCOTUScast

WSJ What’s News

FedSoc Events

Bloomberg Law

FedSoc Forums

The Glenn Show

Faculty Division Bookshelf

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

The Editors

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

Uncommon Knowledge

Strict Scrutiny

Advisory Opinions

The Ezra Klein Show

Amarica's Constitution

Divided Argument

Honestly with Bari Weiss