Breathing Anxiety, Air Hunger & CO₂ Tolerance: What Your Brain Is Predicting
Why does air hunger feel manageable for one person and threatening for another — even when their underlying breathing physiology may be very similar?
In this episode of The Breath Science Podcast, I explore the relationship between CO₂ tolerance, breathing anxiety, breathlessness and respiratory interoception — and why the way your brain interprets a respiratory sensation may matter just as much as the signal itself.
In breathwork and functional breathing, we often focus on breathing rate, tidal volume, CO₂ sensitivity, nasal breathing, respiratory mechanics and chemosensitivity.
These things matter.
But they may not completely explain why someone feels distressed by their breathing.
The brain does not simply receive information from the respiratory system. It also predicts what it expects those sensations to mean.
That distinction becomes particularly interesting when we look at air hunger and breathlessness anxiety.
Two people may experience a similar respiratory stimulus while having very different emotional responses to it.
In this episode, I explore research from Olivia Harrison and colleagues examining respiratory interoception, anxiety and breathlessness — including findings in endurance athletes that raise some fascinating questions about how repeated experiences of intense breathing may shape our predictions about respiratory discomfort.
We explore:
• What respiratory interoception actually means
• The difference between respiratory sensitivity and perception accuracy
• Why breathing anxiety does not necessarily mean you detect respiratory changes more accurately
• How predictive processing may influence the experience of breathlessness
• CO₂ sensitivity and chemosensitivity
• Why endurance athletes may experience greater anxiety around maximal breathlessness
• The difference between breathlessness intensity and breathlessness unpleasantness
• How anticipation can influence respiratory sensations
• Why exposure to air hunger alone may not reduce respiratory anxiety
• CO₂ tolerance versus air hunger tolerance
• Why safety, control and context may matter when training respiratory discomfort
One of the central questions I explore is:
What if the problem isn’t always the respiratory signal, but what the brain has learnt that signal means?
Rather than only asking, “How can we improve CO₂ tolerance?”, perhaps we also need to ask whether someone can experience air hunger while remaining regulated, safe and in control.
Because breathing is not simply a mechanical event.
It is also a sensation, a prediction, an interpretation — and it carries meaning.
If you work in breathwork, breathing retraining, respiratory science, sports performance, anxiety, rehabilitation or human physiology, this is an area of breathing science that deserves far more attention.
I'm Martin McPhilimey, a respiratory and sleep scientist and founder of the School of Breath Science.
I help health-driven people — and the coaches, therapists and practitioners who guide them — separate real breath science from wellness hype, drawing on more than 15 years across clinical, academic and coaching settings.
Free guide: How to Spot Manipulation in Breathwork Marketing
https://masterclass.schoolofbreathscience.com/checklist
Get certified with BRIT or the Breath Science Certification:
https://www.schoolofbreathscience.com/courses/
Join the free School of Breath Science community:
https://community.schoolofbreathscience.com/getting-started
Follow me on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/martinmcphilimey
1:1 coaching enquiries:
https://www.martinmcphilimey.com
This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for individualised medical or clinical advice.