In this episode, Aaron uses an unlikely case study — a senior Chinese Crested named Nor-BERT — to examine what happens when surface appearance overrides structural reality. At first glance, Norbert looks broken. Look closer and you find intact lineage. Genetics. Integrity. The tension becomes a systems question: how often do markets, policymakers, and investors react to signal instead of structure?

See adoption link if you are interested in Adopting Nor-BERT (please let me come hang out if you find yourself as his caretaker).

If you’ve followed the arc of this season — from claims under scrutiny to regulatory correction to The Divorce — the pattern should feel familiar. Visibility allocates power. This episode extends that framework into language itself. If you missed the prior episodes, go back. The argument compounds. And if this work is helping you see where signal is distorting capital and policy, consider supporting it. Independent analysis only continues if operators decide it matters.

This Podcast is 100% reader-supported. To help support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber, the money goes towards helping me babble on and on about nothing of note.

Aaron then walks through how exposure scales faster than stewardship. A local hot spring collapses when visibility outruns norms. Industries drift when headlines outrun infrastructure. Surface signal photographs well. Structural reality survives stress. The difference determines where capital flows.

The discussion pivots to the word “organic.” To a chemist, it means carbon-containing compounds. To the USDA’s National Organic Program, it means regulated production and audit-backed certification. To consumers, it signals trust. Same word. Three systems. Markets do not reconcile that divergence — they monetize it. Once a word becomes enforceable, it becomes infrastructure.

From there, the lens returns to hemp. Fiber, grain, and flower are distinct structural realities operating under one public label. The most visible segment defines the category. Regulation follows visibility. Capital assigns volatility to the entire word. Fiber absorbs risk it did not generate. That is not ideology. It is systems behavior.

The lesson: markets regulate what is visible, not what is load-bearing.

If this framework sharpens how you think about signal, structure, and capital allocation, back the work that keeps mapping these patterns.

Get full access to Aaron Furman's Beyond the Baja Hemp Podcast at aaronfurman1.substack.com/subscribe