Argued on April 9, 2019, at the University of Kansas School of Law in Lawrence, Kansas.

Issue: Whether the military judge erred in admitting hearsay statements as  prior consistent statements under Mil.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B)(i) where the defense theory posited the improper influence or motive preceded the  allegedly consistent statements.

http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-frost/

Note:  Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter