Argued on February 19, 2019
 
Issue: Whether the Army Court erred by affirming a novel specification covered by an enumerated Art. 134, UCMJ offense. 
 
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-gleason/
 
Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.

Argued on February 19, 2019 Issue: Whether the Army Court erred by affirming a novel specification covered by an enumerated Art. 134, UCMJ offense. CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-gleason/ Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.

Argued on February 19, 2019
 
Issue: Whether the Army Court erred by affirming a novel specification covered by an enumerated Art. 134, UCMJ offense.&nbsp;
 
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-gleason/
 
Note:&nbsp;Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.

CAAF: United States v. Gleason, No. 18-0305/AR

This podcast re-distributes audio of oral arguments at CAAF and the CCAs, and occasionally at other courts. The audio recordings are created by the individual courts and the recordings are generally available on each court's website; this podcast duplicates those recordings in the form of a podcast for listener convenience.

Share CAAF: United States v. Gleason, No. 18-0305/AR

Sign up to save your podcasts

CAAF: United States v. Gleason, No. 18-0305/AR

CAAF: United States v. Gleason, No. 18-0305/AR