Argued on April 23, 2019.

Issues:

I. Whether an appellant is authorized to request Pierce credit for the first time at a Court of Criminal Appeals.

II. If the Army Court of Criminal Appeals erred in holding that the failure to request Pierce credit below constituted waiver, was its actual review of this issue under its article 66(c), UCMJ authority still sufficient?

http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-haynes/

Note:  Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.