Argued on October 22, 2019.

Index:

Appellant's argument (MAJ Burroughs): 00:35

Appellant's argument (Mr. Potter): 41:20

Gov't Div. argument (MAJ Parnell): 56:25

Appellant's rebuttal argument (MAJ Burroughs): 1:32:15

Issues:

I. Whether a break in Appellant’s service foreclosed the exercise of court-martial jurisdiction.

II. Whether the charges arose in the Armed Forces, and fell within the subject matter jurisdiction of a capital court-martial.

III. Whether the court-martial had personal jurisdiction over Appellant.

IV. Whether the military judge denied appellant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.

V. Whether the military judge abused his discretion in restricting defense counsel’s voir dire and in denying defense challenges for cause.

https://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2019-term/united-states-v-hennis-october-2019-term/

Note: Audio merged into a single file and post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter and a noise reduction filter.