
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Argued on May 21, 2019.
Issues:
I. Whether the Army Court erroneously denied appellant a post-trial R.C.M. 706 inquiry by requiring a greater showing than a non-frivolous, good faith basis articulated by United States v. Nix, 15 C.M.A. 578, 582, 36 C.M.R 76, 80 (1965).
II. Whether the Army Court erred when it held that submitting matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), was evidence of Appellant’s competence during appellate proceedings.
http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-navarette/
Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.
By CAAFlogArgued on May 21, 2019.
Issues:
I. Whether the Army Court erroneously denied appellant a post-trial R.C.M. 706 inquiry by requiring a greater showing than a non-frivolous, good faith basis articulated by United States v. Nix, 15 C.M.A. 578, 582, 36 C.M.R 76, 80 (1965).
II. Whether the Army Court erred when it held that submitting matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), was evidence of Appellant’s competence during appellate proceedings.
http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-navarette/
Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.