Argued on December 4, 2018. 
 
Issue: Whether the Government made major changes to the time frame of three offenses, over defense objection, and failed to prefer them anew in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 603. 
 
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-stout/
 
 Note:  Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.

Argued on December 4, 2018. Issue: Whether the Government made major changes to the time frame of three offenses, over defense objection, and failed to prefer them anew in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 603. CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-stout/ Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.

Argued on December 4, 2018.&nbsp;
 
Issue: Whether the Government made major changes to the time frame of three offenses, over defense objection, and failed to prefer them anew in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 603.&nbsp;
 
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-stout/
 
&nbsp;Note: &nbsp;Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.&nbsp;

CAAF: United States v. Stout, No. 18-0273/AR

This podcast re-distributes audio of oral arguments at CAAF and the CCAs, and occasionally at other courts. The audio recordings are created by the individual courts and the recordings are generally available on each court's website; this podcast duplicates those recordings in the form of a podcast for listener convenience.

Share CAAF: United States v. Stout, No. 18-0273/AR

Sign up to save your podcasts

CAAF: United States v. Stout, No. 18-0273/AR

CAAF: United States v. Stout, No. 18-0273/AR