
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Argued on February 21, 2019
Issue: Whether the Army Court erred, first, in finding that this Court overruled sub silencio the Supreme Court holding in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967), and this Court’s own holdings in United States v. Wolford, 62 M.J. 418, 420 (C.A.A.F. 2006), and in United States v. Hills, 75 M.J. 350, 357 (C.A.A.F. 2016), and, consequently, in testing for prejudice in this case using the standard for nonconstitutional error.
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-tovarchavez/
Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.
By CAAFlogArgued on February 21, 2019
Issue: Whether the Army Court erred, first, in finding that this Court overruled sub silencio the Supreme Court holding in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967), and this Court’s own holdings in United States v. Wolford, 62 M.J. 418, 420 (C.A.A.F. 2006), and in United States v. Hills, 75 M.J. 350, 357 (C.A.A.F. 2016), and, consequently, in testing for prejudice in this case using the standard for nonconstitutional error.
CAAFlog case page: http://www.caaflog.com/category/october-2018-term/united-states-v-tovarchavez/
Note: Audio post-processed for this podcast with a dynamic normalizer filter.