
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In today’s episode, I’m diving into the viral claim behind the triple nod, touted as a research backed hack for better communication. We’ll trace its evolution over the years, explore the research (or lack thereof) that backs it up, and unpack how ambiguous stats and missing citations can turn into misinformation. From precise percentages to vague references, we’ll see whether this popular nonverbal cue holds up to scrutiny.
Join me as I separate fact from fiction, explain why transparency in sharing “research” matters, and share tips for navigating the next viral stat you encounter.
Referenced:
By Kirsten Lee HillIn today’s episode, I’m diving into the viral claim behind the triple nod, touted as a research backed hack for better communication. We’ll trace its evolution over the years, explore the research (or lack thereof) that backs it up, and unpack how ambiguous stats and missing citations can turn into misinformation. From precise percentages to vague references, we’ll see whether this popular nonverbal cue holds up to scrutiny.
Join me as I separate fact from fiction, explain why transparency in sharing “research” matters, and share tips for navigating the next viral stat you encounter.
Referenced: