
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this case, the EAT was asked to consider whether an employee’s previous tolerance of inappropriate language is a relevant factor that should be considered when determining a sexual harassment claim. The employee complained that she had been sexually harassed at work and the employer argued that the conduct complained off was “office banter”, the kind of which had been ongoing for a significant period of time and about which the employee had never complained before. Listen along to find out what happened!
Visit www.indicator.co.uk to explore our product range, or connect with us on social media:
YouTube
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.
By IndicatorIn this case, the EAT was asked to consider whether an employee’s previous tolerance of inappropriate language is a relevant factor that should be considered when determining a sexual harassment claim. The employee complained that she had been sexually harassed at work and the employer argued that the conduct complained off was “office banter”, the kind of which had been ongoing for a significant period of time and about which the employee had never complained before. Listen along to find out what happened!
Visit www.indicator.co.uk to explore our product range, or connect with us on social media:
YouTube
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.