Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Cannabis Brand Must Pay $2M for "Cannaburst" Product | The Ramifications of Intentional and Malicious Trademark Infringement
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Cannabis Brand Must Pay $2M for "Cannaburst" Product | The Ramifications of Intentional and Malicious Trademark Infringement
Send us a text
Wrigley, the company that owns Starbursts, Skittles, and LifeSavers recently won over $2 Million in a trademark infringement lawsuit against a cannabis candy company because the court determined that the cannabis brand's infringement was willful and malicious.
Listen to this episode to better understand the ramifications of willful, intentional, and malicious trademark infringement and avoid making the same mistake as this cannabis brand.
Follow along @legallyivy and @heistishpodcast for more
Disclaimer: The information provided does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials provided are for general informational purposes only.
View all episodes
By Ivy McNeill | Attorney and Legal AnalystSend us a text
Wrigley, the company that owns Starbursts, Skittles, and LifeSavers recently won over $2 Million in a trademark infringement lawsuit against a cannabis candy company because the court determined that the cannabis brand's infringement was willful and malicious.
Listen to this episode to better understand the ramifications of willful, intentional, and malicious trademark infringement and avoid making the same mistake as this cannabis brand.
Follow along @legallyivy and @heistishpodcast for more
Disclaimer: The information provided does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials provided are for general informational purposes only.