DEFENDANT: Snoop Dogg
 
EVIDENCE: 19 Crimes "Cali Red"
 
SCENE OF THE CRIME: Sonoma County, CA
--
Rachel asks about how wines get their color and learns to stop using food dyes, while Topher tries to navigate the confusing world of dressing professionally on the streets as a gang member.

DEFENDANT: Snoop Dogg EVIDENCE: 19 Crimes "Cali Red" SCENE OF THE CRIME: Sonoma County, CA -- Rachel asks about how wines get their color and learns to stop using food dyes, while Topher tries to navigate the confusing world of dressing professionally on the streets as a gang member.

DEFENDANT: Snoop Dogg
&nbsp;
EVIDENCE: 19 Crimes "Cali Red"
&nbsp;
SCENE OF THE CRIME: Sonoma County, CA
--
Rachel asks about how wines get their color and learns to stop using food dyes, while Topher tries to navigate the confusing world of dressing professionally on the streets as a gang member.

CASE 0102: For Shizzle My Nizzle!

Celebrities can be talented, sure, but should they really be making wine? Join Judges Topher and Rachel as they use their oenological savvy and pop culture deep cuts to answer that very question. After drinking all the evidence and sorting their way through red herrings, they will determine whether some of Hollywood and music's biggest stars are, in fact, guilty of True Crimes Against Wine.

Share CASE 0102: For Shizzle My Nizzle!

Sign up to save your podcasts

CASE 0102: For Shizzle My Nizzle!

CASE 0102: For Shizzle My Nizzle!