Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share CASE BRIEF - Sullivan v. NY Times - Part 1
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
CASE BRIEF - Sullivan v. NY Times - Part 1
In this Case Brief, we talk defamation and Sullivan v. New York Times, the Supreme Court decision that reshaped defamation law. But you can’t talk about defamation without first talking about the First Amendment. We begin by breaking down the scope of the First Amendment, including the protections—and limits—of the Free Speech Clause.
We then turn to the historical background of the case and the United States in the early 1960s. Set against the backdrop of the Civil Rights Movement, we examine how a single full-page New York Times advertisement supporting Martin Luther King Jr., and the Greensboro Four Woolworth sit-ins, triggered a coordinated effort by Alabama officials to sue Northern newspapers for defamation in an attempt to silence criticism from the North.
Finally, we dive into the Alabama jury trial that resulted in a verdict for Sullivan and an award equivalent to nearly $3 million against the New York Times and we read one of the craziest f-ing things ever said by a trial judge from the bench. Join us as we unpack the case that explains why public figures cannot sue their way out of criticism, and why the First Amendment still matters even when speech untrue.
The information provided in this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. The content should not be construed as legal advice or any lawyer client relationship.The information is not a substitute for professional legal counsel. THESE ARE JUST OUR OPINIONS!!!
Reach out or follow us:
Instagram: @gavel_and_gossip
TikTok: @gavel.gossip
Leslie's Instagram: @lesliecaesq
Kristan's Instagram: @krush18
CLIPS NOW ON YOUTUBE! Gavel_and_Gossip
Links, episode information, documents and pictures credits can be found at: https://sites.google.com/view/gavelandgossip/home
View all episodes
By Leslie and KristanIn this Case Brief, we talk defamation and Sullivan v. New York Times, the Supreme Court decision that reshaped defamation law. But you can’t talk about defamation without first talking about the First Amendment. We begin by breaking down the scope of the First Amendment, including the protections—and limits—of the Free Speech Clause.
We then turn to the historical background of the case and the United States in the early 1960s. Set against the backdrop of the Civil Rights Movement, we examine how a single full-page New York Times advertisement supporting Martin Luther King Jr., and the Greensboro Four Woolworth sit-ins, triggered a coordinated effort by Alabama officials to sue Northern newspapers for defamation in an attempt to silence criticism from the North.
Finally, we dive into the Alabama jury trial that resulted in a verdict for Sullivan and an award equivalent to nearly $3 million against the New York Times and we read one of the craziest f-ing things ever said by a trial judge from the bench. Join us as we unpack the case that explains why public figures cannot sue their way out of criticism, and why the First Amendment still matters even when speech untrue.
The information provided in this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. The content should not be construed as legal advice or any lawyer client relationship.The information is not a substitute for professional legal counsel. THESE ARE JUST OUR OPINIONS!!!
Reach out or follow us:
Instagram: @gavel_and_gossip
TikTok: @gavel.gossip
Leslie's Instagram: @lesliecaesq
Kristan's Instagram: @krush18
CLIPS NOW ON YOUTUBE! Gavel_and_Gossip
Links, episode information, documents and pictures credits can be found at: https://sites.google.com/view/gavelandgossip/home