<p>A man was accused of historical sexual abuse against a child while he was a minor and was tried in a youth court as a result. The complainant was an adult at the time of the complaint and her evidence mainly relied on the inference that she had a bed wetting problem as a result of ongoing sexual abuse. It was a judge-only trial. </p>
<ul><li><a href='https://youtu.be/Hxew3qFXHJc'>Original YouTube video</a></li>
</ul>

A man was accused of historical sexual abuse against a child while he was a minor and was tried in a youth court as a result. The complainant was an adult at the time of the complaint and her evidence mainly relied on the inference that she had a bed wetting problem as a result of ongoing sexual abuse. It was a judge-only trial. Original YouTube video

<p>A man was accused of historical sexual abuse against a child while he was a minor and was tried in a youth court as a result. The complainant was an adult at the time of the complaint and her evidence mainly relied on the inference that she had a bed wetting problem as a result of ongoing sexual abuse. It was a judge-only trial.&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><a href="https://youtu.be/Hxew3qFXHJc" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original YouTube video</a></li>
</ul>

Case Study #1 | Ignoring Major Inconsistencies | Overturned Conviction

Critiquing & explaining Canada's criminal justice system from a non-lawyer point of view.

Education

Critiquing &amp; explaining Canada's criminal justice system from a non-lawyer point of view.

Share Case Study #1 | Ignoring Major Inconsistencies | Overturned Conviction

Sign up to save your podcasts

Case Study #1 | Ignoring Major Inconsistencies | Overturned Conviction

Case Study #1 | Ignoring Major Inconsistencies | Overturned Conviction