Send us a text

Reframing the Debate on Sexual Offense NarrativesThis episode discusses the impact of the terminology used in debates about sexual offenses, focusing on a high-profile case involving the 'Stanford rapist.' The case highlights how the interpretation of events—whether an act is seen as consensual sex or rape—often depends on the narrative accepted by the court. The discussion suggests that changing the language used in these debates could significantly advance the conversation on this critical issue.

Support the show