
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


ChatGPT vs Qwen vs DeepSeek.
A comprehensive study compares the performance of ChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek across various real-world AI applications, including language understanding, data analysis, and complex problem-solving.
This article benchmarks three AI modelsāChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeekāacross various tasks, including physics simulations, problem-solving, and creative writing. DeepSeek excels in precision and complex calculations, making it ideal for scientific and engineering applications. Qwendemonstrates strong problem-solving speed and multilingual capabilities, suitable for business and legal tasks. ChatGPT, while proficient in creative writing, struggles with complex problems, requiring multiple attempts for solutions. The comparison highlights the unique strengths and weaknesses of each model, guiding users towards the most appropriate AI tool based on their specific needs. Ultimately, the article advocates for choosing AI models based on task-specific requirements rather than solely focusing on general performance.
Which AI Model Outperforms in Coding, Mechanics, and Algorithmic Precisionā Which Model Delivers Real-World Precision?
Reference: https://decodebuzzing.medium.com/qbenchmarking-chatgpt-qwen-and-deepseek-on-real-world-ai-tasks-75b4d7040742
š Support My Podcast and Channel:
Consider buying me a coffee to say thank you for the free tech content on my YouTube channel (@enoumen) and the AI Unraveled podcast.
https://buy.stripe.com/3csaEQ1ST9nYgfe4gk
ā” AI Engineer On-Demand: Your Monthly Subscription to Quick, Powerful Solutions
[caption id="attachment_4921" align="alignnone" width="525"] AI Engineer on Demand[/caption]
Listen
AI Engineer On-Demand, offers businesses rapid access to skilled AI engineers for problem-solving, development, and consulting. This model allows companies to scale AI projects efficiently without the need for long-term hiring commitments.
Learn more and connect. Schedule a zoom call here.
Ready to commit, subscribe here
By Etienne Noumen4.6
1111 ratings
ChatGPT vs Qwen vs DeepSeek.
A comprehensive study compares the performance of ChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek across various real-world AI applications, including language understanding, data analysis, and complex problem-solving.
This article benchmarks three AI modelsāChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeekāacross various tasks, including physics simulations, problem-solving, and creative writing. DeepSeek excels in precision and complex calculations, making it ideal for scientific and engineering applications. Qwendemonstrates strong problem-solving speed and multilingual capabilities, suitable for business and legal tasks. ChatGPT, while proficient in creative writing, struggles with complex problems, requiring multiple attempts for solutions. The comparison highlights the unique strengths and weaknesses of each model, guiding users towards the most appropriate AI tool based on their specific needs. Ultimately, the article advocates for choosing AI models based on task-specific requirements rather than solely focusing on general performance.
Which AI Model Outperforms in Coding, Mechanics, and Algorithmic Precisionā Which Model Delivers Real-World Precision?
Reference: https://decodebuzzing.medium.com/qbenchmarking-chatgpt-qwen-and-deepseek-on-real-world-ai-tasks-75b4d7040742
š Support My Podcast and Channel:
Consider buying me a coffee to say thank you for the free tech content on my YouTube channel (@enoumen) and the AI Unraveled podcast.
https://buy.stripe.com/3csaEQ1ST9nYgfe4gk
ā” AI Engineer On-Demand: Your Monthly Subscription to Quick, Powerful Solutions
[caption id="attachment_4921" align="alignnone" width="525"] AI Engineer on Demand[/caption]
Listen
AI Engineer On-Demand, offers businesses rapid access to skilled AI engineers for problem-solving, development, and consulting. This model allows companies to scale AI projects efficiently without the need for long-term hiring commitments.
Learn more and connect. Schedule a zoom call here.
Ready to commit, subscribe here

303 Listeners

341 Listeners

156 Listeners

213 Listeners

306 Listeners

476 Listeners

152 Listeners

210 Listeners

586 Listeners

268 Listeners

101 Listeners

55 Listeners

176 Listeners

61 Listeners

134 Listeners