Experiments

Cheap Audio Ampflication for Piezo Buzzers: PAM8610 vs TPA3310 vs TDA2030


Listen Later

I decided to see how low you can get in costs for amplifiers suitable to drive a piezo buzzer sound installation. Basically you get all sort of digital amplifier ICs soldered on a small board with a basic circuit around.

I am now comparing three boards, based on the PAM8610, TPA3310, TDA2030 chips. After I got a lot of background noise for the PAM8610, I figured that the amplification is actually too high, and compared to the previous test, I no longer use a coil transform to match the impedance better with the piezos. With a direct connection, you no longer get background hissing, but you need to drive the amp higher with the line signal. I run all three at 12V, but the line levels are set differently to better match the capabilities of each board. That is to say, they are not equally powerful at full level.

Here's a comparison of the three boards:

  • PAM8610 based: two channels, runs off 12V, has through holes for powering, left/right output, and stereo line input. No LED power indicator. Pro: all contacts have grid dimension 2.54mm. Pro: small footprint (and shallow, as there are no heat sinks, I guess it doesn't require them). Pro: Quite strong. Con: Left and right output connections are on opposite sides, which can be inconvenient.
  • TPA3310 based: two channels, runs off 9 to 24V, has through holes for powering, left/right output, and stereo line input. Medium bright Blue LED power indicator. Pro: Strongest and most balanced sound quality. Con: most expensive one. Con: power and output connectors use grid dimension 7.62mm so you cannot use standard 5.08mm 2-pin terminals. Con: largest form factor.
  • TDA2030 based: single channel, runs off 6 to 12V, has four input pins for line signal and power, and a screw terminal for the amplified output. Very bright red LED power indicator. There is a small potentiometre that can be used to attenuate the amplification. Without the transform, I ended up having it turned all the way up. Pro: cheapest. Pro: smallest footprint. Pro: comes with screw terminals (can be advantage or disadvantage, depending on your use case). Con: sounded the most muffled in my opinion, with pour high frequency or dynamics reproduction. Con: no mounting holes on the board.
  • At the end of the video, you can hear again all three in succession, playing the same snippet. Note: volumes have been adjusted to match. The TPA3310 seems to vibrate the glass more, but I think it's a positive indicator for better bass reproduction, whereas the PAM8610 might appear more "neutral" but seems to have stronger distortion (to my ears).

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    ExperimentsBy