In this in-depth roundtable discussion, Eli Frame, Robert Birch, Dan Hanke, and Tim Gardner confront the unresolved contradictions, institutional failures, and lingering questions surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.This conversation does not attempt to sell a single theory. Instead, it examines where the official narrative collapses, where witness testimony becomes unreliable, and where uncomfortable questions continue to remain unanswered more than six decades later.Topics explored in this episode include:• The documented sloppiness of the Dallas Police Department before, during, and after November 22, 1963• Which assassination witnesses appear credible — and which raise serious red flags• Whether identifying the shooters is still possible — and whether that question even matters anymore• Why Officer J.D. Tippit appeared panicked in the moments before his death• How and why Officers Kroy and Westbrook arrived at the Tippit scene unusually early• Jack Ruby’s astonishingly easy access to the Dallas Police basement• The mysterious man with the radio standing near the Umbrella Man in Dealey Plaza• A realistic assessment of how the JFK case progressed in 2025• What the assassination research community should expect in 2026 — optimism, stagnation, or strategic silence• Whether NBC will ever release the Weigman and Darnell films, and why those images still matter• The broader question: truth versus narrative, and how history chooses which version survivesRather than chasing sensational claims, this discussion focuses on patterns, behavior, timing, and institutional accountability. It challenges the idea that the assassination was simply a tragedy frozen in time — and asks whether the truth has been deliberately buried beneath confusion, contradiction, and delay.This episode is essential viewing for anyone interested in critical thinking, historical integrity, and the ongoing struggle between truth and lies in the JFK assassination story.