Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Clash vol 3 - Act 3 - Two Systems Ahead
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Clash vol 3 - Act 3 - Two Systems Ahead
Chapter 10
Win-Win vs Lose-Lose: The Time Has Come for the World to Choose
Chapter 11
Xi and Putin Stand up For Humanity at Davos: Closed vs Open System
Ideologies Clash Again
Chapter 12
The Collision of Two Opposing Green Destinies
Chapter 13
From COP26 to COVID19: The Fallacy of Predictive Models and a Return to Real Thinking
Chapter 14
Davos Billionaires Want to Save the Planet… Why Don’t Developing Countries Trust Them?
Chapter 15
The EU’s ‘Fit for 55,’ ‘Farm to Fork’ and the Freezing of Nord Stream 2: A Mass Sacrifice to the Gods? By Cynthia Chung
____
The text excerpt is from a book titled Clash of the Two Americas, which argues that a clash of ideologies is underway between a multipolar world led by China and Russia, and a unipolar world led by the United States. The author, who seems sympathetic to the multipolar view, argues that the US-led unipolar world is characterized by closed systems of governance that seek to control resources and populations through top-down models of economic and environmental management. This approach, the author claims, is rooted in Malthusian views that population growth needs to be curbed. In contrast, the author argues that the multipolar world embraces open systems, emphasizing cooperation and a belief in humanity's potential for progress. The author highlights the Belt and Road Initiative as an example of how the multipolar world is working to promote growth and development, and criticizes the West's embrace of "sustainable development" which the author believes is a euphemism for degrowth and depopulation. The text goes on to criticize the Davos World Economic Forum and the UN's Agenda 2030, arguing that both institutions represent a threat to global sovereignty and are attempting to impose a technocratic form of feudalism on the world through their promotion of "green" policies and their focus on “predictive modeling”. The author argues that these policies will lead to increased poverty and a lack of economic justice. The author also points to the EU's "Fit for 55" and "Farm to Fork" initiatives as examples of policies that will harm agriculture and the energy sector, ultimately leading to a shortage of food and energy.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
View all episodes
By Robert MorleyChapter 10
Win-Win vs Lose-Lose: The Time Has Come for the World to Choose
Chapter 11
Xi and Putin Stand up For Humanity at Davos: Closed vs Open System
Ideologies Clash Again
Chapter 12
The Collision of Two Opposing Green Destinies
Chapter 13
From COP26 to COVID19: The Fallacy of Predictive Models and a Return to Real Thinking
Chapter 14
Davos Billionaires Want to Save the Planet… Why Don’t Developing Countries Trust Them?
Chapter 15
The EU’s ‘Fit for 55,’ ‘Farm to Fork’ and the Freezing of Nord Stream 2: A Mass Sacrifice to the Gods? By Cynthia Chung
____
The text excerpt is from a book titled Clash of the Two Americas, which argues that a clash of ideologies is underway between a multipolar world led by China and Russia, and a unipolar world led by the United States. The author, who seems sympathetic to the multipolar view, argues that the US-led unipolar world is characterized by closed systems of governance that seek to control resources and populations through top-down models of economic and environmental management. This approach, the author claims, is rooted in Malthusian views that population growth needs to be curbed. In contrast, the author argues that the multipolar world embraces open systems, emphasizing cooperation and a belief in humanity's potential for progress. The author highlights the Belt and Road Initiative as an example of how the multipolar world is working to promote growth and development, and criticizes the West's embrace of "sustainable development" which the author believes is a euphemism for degrowth and depopulation. The text goes on to criticize the Davos World Economic Forum and the UN's Agenda 2030, arguing that both institutions represent a threat to global sovereignty and are attempting to impose a technocratic form of feudalism on the world through their promotion of "green" policies and their focus on “predictive modeling”. The author argues that these policies will lead to increased poverty and a lack of economic justice. The author also points to the EU's "Fit for 55" and "Farm to Fork" initiatives as examples of policies that will harm agriculture and the energy sector, ultimately leading to a shortage of food and energy.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.