Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Climate Denial's Lie: The 6 Stages of Neo-Skepticism 💥
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Climate Denial's Lie: The 6 Stages of Neo-Skepticism 💥
Enjoying the show? Support our mission and help keep the content coming by buying us a coffee.
The fight against climate change is now a sophisticated information war. We expose the global playbook of disinformation and denial, revealing how organized efforts, fueled by money and vested interests, are actively shifting their tactics to prevent large-scale climate action.
Our mission is to give you a crystal-clear understanding of the specific myths, the money behind them, and the rhetorical tricks designed to create a paralyzing fog of doubt around solutions.
Climate disinformation is no longer about simply rejecting warming; it's a strategic retreat to neo-skepticism—accepting warming but attacking the urgency and cost of action.
The Six Stages of Retreat (Michael Mann): Denialists only concede a point when it's impossible to defend, then immediately fall back to a new position. The retreat moves from (1) CO2 is not increasing to (3) Warming is natural (sunspots) to the final stage (6) It's too late to do anything, or magic technology will fix it, justifying inaction.
Fake Experts: Giving a huge platform to people with PhDs in unrelated fields (e.g., geology) who disagree with the consensus, creating a false sense of a 50/50 debate.
Cherry-Picking: Using only short, isolated data points to try and contradict the clear long-term trend, creating a statistical lie.
Conspiracy Theories: Alleging scientists are faking data, hiding the truth, or pushing an agenda for financial gain, undermining the entire scientific community.
Logical Fallacies: Attacking the scientists personally (ad hominem) or demanding absolute, perfect certainty before acting (an impossible standard).
Two technical myths are widely used to sow doubt:
The Trace Gas Myth: The claim that CO2 (0.04% of the atmosphere) is too small to matter ignores the physical property that the CO2 molecule is an incredibly powerful heat-trapping gas.
Water Vapor Myth: The claim that water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas ignores that CO2 is the furnace thermostat. CO2 sets the baseline temperature, and water vapor acts as a powerful feedback loop, amplifying the initial CO2 warming.
The denial machine is persistent because it is heavily funded and rooted in profit protection:
Organized Denial: The campaign started in the late 1980s, coordinated by contrarian scientists and free-market think tanks (Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute), often funded by major industry actors like ExxonMobil and the Koch Family Network.
The Playbook: The strategy was literally adopted from the tobacco industry playbook: the goal is not to win the science, but to "create doubt" as a product, using PR firms to attack scientists.
The Irony of Exxon: Exxon's own internal scientists accurately predicted the warming trend decades ago, even as the company poured millions into funding external groups whose sole purpose was to deny the findings.
Profiting from Doubt: Denial is monetized because sensational content makes money. Online ad systems reward the clicks and engagement of climate-skeptic sites, inadvertently funding the spread of denial and creating a vicious cycle.
As denying the science becomes impossible, the denial machine attacks the solutions:
Geoengineering Confusion: Conspiracy theories like "chemtrails" (claiming planes spray chemicals for mind control) are baseless, but they effectively undermine the legitimate, necessary public debate on the real environmental risks of actual solar geoengineering proposals.
Final Question: Soft climate denial is where people accept the science but fail to translate that knowledge into meaningful action. If the denial machine wants paralysis, the antidote must be movement. How critical is our individual commitment to actively thinking critically, checking sources, and translating knowledge into actual support for climate action?
View all episodes
By Conspiracy Decoded PodcastEnjoying the show? Support our mission and help keep the content coming by buying us a coffee.
The fight against climate change is now a sophisticated information war. We expose the global playbook of disinformation and denial, revealing how organized efforts, fueled by money and vested interests, are actively shifting their tactics to prevent large-scale climate action.
Our mission is to give you a crystal-clear understanding of the specific myths, the money behind them, and the rhetorical tricks designed to create a paralyzing fog of doubt around solutions.
Climate disinformation is no longer about simply rejecting warming; it's a strategic retreat to neo-skepticism—accepting warming but attacking the urgency and cost of action.
The Six Stages of Retreat (Michael Mann): Denialists only concede a point when it's impossible to defend, then immediately fall back to a new position. The retreat moves from (1) CO2 is not increasing to (3) Warming is natural (sunspots) to the final stage (6) It's too late to do anything, or magic technology will fix it, justifying inaction.
Fake Experts: Giving a huge platform to people with PhDs in unrelated fields (e.g., geology) who disagree with the consensus, creating a false sense of a 50/50 debate.
Cherry-Picking: Using only short, isolated data points to try and contradict the clear long-term trend, creating a statistical lie.
Conspiracy Theories: Alleging scientists are faking data, hiding the truth, or pushing an agenda for financial gain, undermining the entire scientific community.
Logical Fallacies: Attacking the scientists personally (ad hominem) or demanding absolute, perfect certainty before acting (an impossible standard).
Two technical myths are widely used to sow doubt:
The Trace Gas Myth: The claim that CO2 (0.04% of the atmosphere) is too small to matter ignores the physical property that the CO2 molecule is an incredibly powerful heat-trapping gas.
Water Vapor Myth: The claim that water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas ignores that CO2 is the furnace thermostat. CO2 sets the baseline temperature, and water vapor acts as a powerful feedback loop, amplifying the initial CO2 warming.
The denial machine is persistent because it is heavily funded and rooted in profit protection:
Organized Denial: The campaign started in the late 1980s, coordinated by contrarian scientists and free-market think tanks (Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute), often funded by major industry actors like ExxonMobil and the Koch Family Network.
The Playbook: The strategy was literally adopted from the tobacco industry playbook: the goal is not to win the science, but to "create doubt" as a product, using PR firms to attack scientists.
The Irony of Exxon: Exxon's own internal scientists accurately predicted the warming trend decades ago, even as the company poured millions into funding external groups whose sole purpose was to deny the findings.
Profiting from Doubt: Denial is monetized because sensational content makes money. Online ad systems reward the clicks and engagement of climate-skeptic sites, inadvertently funding the spread of denial and creating a vicious cycle.
As denying the science becomes impossible, the denial machine attacks the solutions:
Geoengineering Confusion: Conspiracy theories like "chemtrails" (claiming planes spray chemicals for mind control) are baseless, but they effectively undermine the legitimate, necessary public debate on the real environmental risks of actual solar geoengineering proposals.
Final Question: Soft climate denial is where people accept the science but fail to translate that knowledge into meaningful action. If the denial machine wants paralysis, the antidote must be movement. How critical is our individual commitment to actively thinking critically, checking sources, and translating knowledge into actual support for climate action?