Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:
- What is your assessment of the current U.S. policy toward Ukraine, particularly regarding military aid and reimbursement by European countries?
- How do you interpret Lindsey Graham’s statement about a turning point in U.S. relations with Russia, especially concerning arms sales to Europe?
- Do you believe Macron’s push to double France's defense budget is justified, and where should the funding come from?
- Is there a realistic possibility of Russia targeting France, as claimed by French military leadership?
- What are the long-term implications of NATO's increased defense spending on European populations?
Col. Jacques Baud:
- The U.S. policy under Trump shifts conflict into business by selling military equipment to Europe and Ukraine, making them reimburse costs. This contrasts sharply with Biden’s approach.
- Graham highlights a shift in U.S. strategy toward arming allies heavily against Russia, funded by European nations rather than the U.S., signaling strategic realignment.
- Macron's call to increase defense budgets is not new but raises concerns about diverting funds from social programs, which may negatively impact European societies.
- Claims that France is a primary Russian target lack logic or clear justification, suggesting such narratives aim to justify increased military spending rather than reflect reality.
- NATO’s push for higher defense spending will strain economies already facing debt and social issues, especially in Western Europe, leading to potential unrest and resource reallocation.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.