Israel misjudged Iran; Iran showed restraint; conflict may reshape both nations.
Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. What is your assessment of the recent Israeli attack on Iran and its implications?
2. How do you evaluate the initial lack of response from Iran's air defense systems?
3. Do you believe Israel underestimated Iran’s military capabilities in this conflict?
4. How significant is the role of Western support for separatist movements inside Iran?
5. What impact could this conflict have on Israeli society and its political leadership?

Col. Jacques Baud:

1. The initial hours of the attack suggest a tactical approach by Israel, aiming to identify and target Iranian defenses. However, Iran’s measured response indicates resilience and strategic planning.
2. There may have been deliberate delays in activating certain defense systems to avoid revealing their full capabilities early in the attack.
3. Yes, Israel likely overestimated its technological superiority while underestimating Iran’s ability to respond effectively and calibrated its retaliation carefully.
4. Separatist movements supported by the West pose a potential threat, but they are unlikely to destabilize Iran significantly due to strong national unity during crises.
5. The societal impact in Israel could be profound as civilians now experience war firsthand, potentially leading to internal pressure for policy changes, though radicalization remains a risk.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.