Israel's strike may escalate tensions; U.S. ties, deception, and oil deals noted.

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. What is your view on the recent Israeli attack on Iran and its implications?
2. How do you interpret Trump’s contradictory statements regarding the attack?
3. Do you believe the attack will lead to a diplomatic resolution or further escalation?

Amb. Chas Freeman:

1. The attack was likely intended to sabotage peace talks and create pressure on Iran, but it may have the opposite effect.
2. Trump's message before the attack seems deceptive, aimed at keeping Iran off guard, which is not uncommon in warfare.
3. This move might push Iran toward pursuing nuclear weapons, which could significantly escalate tensions in the region.

Col. Larry Wilkerson:

1. The operation shows deep coordination between Israel, the U.S., and intelligence agencies like Mossad and CIA.
2. There appears to be a quid pro quo involving oil infrastructure, as no Israeli strikes targeted Iranian oil facilities.
3. The use of drones and covert operations highlights dangerous precedents in international conflict and diplomacy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.