The Australian government will soon introduce legislation making it compulsory for telecommunication companies to record the data about their customers' use of their services for up to two years, and make it available to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. But is it the right way to go?

"This is very much the way in which western nations are going, it's been the case in Europe under the European Data Retention directive for some little while now," said Attorney-General George Brandis on 16 July. But what he didn't say was that the European Court of Justice has declared the blanket recording of telecommunications data to be a breach of human rights. It isn't a proportionate response to the claimed threat, and there's no evidence that it'll actually even help.

"What we're being asked to do is ourselves -- innocent law-abiding citizens -- to sacrifice our own liberties, our own rights, in the vague hope that it will somehow catch these handful of Nazi Pedos who are out there," said Carly Nyst, London-based legal director of Privacy International. "Nazi Pedos" is PI's label for the "general all-encompassing bad person who lives on the internet" -- terrorists, pedophiles, cyber criminals, or whoever else we're meant to be afraid of this week.

Carly Nyst spoke about the legal and privacy issues surrounding the metadata proposals at public meeting titled "Data Retention: the European Experience", organised by Electronic Frontiers Australia and the Australian Privacy Foundation. This episode of Corrupted Nerds: Conversations presents a lightly-edited version of that event.

This conversation was recorded on 15 October 2014 in Sydney, Australia.

For full credits see:

http://corruptednerds.com/pod/c00012/