Al is joined by Joe and space 4X expert Sid to trace the complete history of the space 4X genre — from its board game roots in 1974 through the golden age of Master of Orion, the dry spell of the late 90s, the modernisation wave of 2010, and what the genre looks like today.

Sid also drops his top 5 space 4X games of all time, we debate why space 4X has never cracked the mainstream, and ask whether Star Trek and Star Wars IPs are perfect candidates for the 4X treatment — and why nobody has ever properly done it.

https://criticalmovespodcast,com

https://www.myabandonware.com/game/star-trek-the-next-generation-birth-of-the-federation-bcm

Al, Jack, and Timothy examine Paradox Interactive's business practices, from their DLC-heavy approach to their handling of development studios. The conversation covers why Paradox games launch incomplete, the nearly £400 cost of owning all Stellaris content, and what happened between Paradox and Colossal Order over City Skylines 2.

The episode compares Paradox's model to other strategy publishers like Creative Assembly and Firaxis, discussing why sequels never arrive for flagship titles while DLC releases continue for years. The hosts explore whether this represents smart business or exploitation of a captive audience, why the community accepts buggy launches as standard practice, and how Paradox's treatment of satellite studios creates human costs behind the games.

Discussion includes EU5's troubled launch, the subscription model as an alternative to buying hundreds of pounds in DLC, and why mod support serves business interests rather than altruism. Despite criticizing the practices, all three hosts admit they'll continue playing Paradox games because no other developer makes grand strategy titles at this scale.

Menace released into early access yesterday. We recorded this episode ten days beforehand having played the demo and knowing almost nothing about what the early access version would include.

The demo showed solid turn-based tactical combat with a complex action point system, deep squad customization options, and strong art direction. It also showed a game from respected developers Overhype Studios and publisher Hooded Horse that had somehow reached nine days before early access without communicating basic information about content, roadmaps, or the strategic layer completely absent from the demo.

This raises questions about whether these studios are trading on goodwill from Battle Brothers and previous Hooded Horse releases to avoid the scrutiny a major publisher would face for the same approach. We discuss what worked in the demo, what the information vacuum means for early access, and whether the game's tactical depth compensates for questionable design decisions around unit specialization and equipment balance.

The game might be great. The marketing and communication is not.

Web: https://criticalmovespodcast.com

Discord: https://criticalmovespodcast.com/discord

Amir and Almog from Tri Arts Games talk about their RTS project Defcon Zero: Frontlines of Tomorrow. They worked for two years without pay on a tech demo that got them 12,000 wishlists through organic community building alone. Then they secured $4.5 million in funding from RTS fans with money to spend, not a publisher trying to squeeze ROI out of the genre.

Tim Campbell from Westwood is their development advisor now. That's the same Tim Campbell who helped build Command & Conquer. They explain how they went from posting a single tank screenshot in a community forum to hiring a proper team and moving into offices. The game has weapon priority systems so your units don't fire tank shells at individual infantrymen when there's an actual tank 50 meters away. Cover mechanics where infantry automatically seek protection when shot at instead of standing in the open watching their health bars drain. Two asymmetric factions with very different approaches to warfare, though they're keeping most of the differences under wraps for now. They're aiming for a playable demo around September or October 2025, with full release in 2.5 to 3 years. The campaign has 30 missions built around the lore instead of being missions with story bolted on afterward.

They already have 40,000 years of world history written out. Both developers bring experience from outside traditional game development. Almog was a psytrance DJ running festivals for 15,000 people before teaching himself 3D art at 35. Amir managed the 80,000-member Command & Conquer Facebook group and worked as a gaming influencer for years. They talk about how their Discord community influences development decisions and why they refuse to use paid promotion when organic reach works better. This is a long interview. We cover their design philosophy, why they chose Unreal Engine for an RTS, how living through conflict shapes their approach to depicting warfare, and whether the RTS genre is experiencing a rebirth or just a temporary spike in interest.

Links:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2923140/Defcon_Zero_Frontlines_of_Tomorrow/ https://discord.com/invite/hvC6g76d5B

Terra Invicta just hit 1.0 after years in early access. It's a grand strategy game where you run a shadowy organization trying to control Earth's nations while aliens show up uninvited.

Al hasn't played it. Tim and Joe have hundreds of hours between them. The game has three layers: geopolitical manipulation on Earth, orbital infrastructure, and hard sci-fi space exploration across the solar system. Real physics, real nations with actual GDP figures and political metrics, and launch windows that matter.

Seven factions compete with different endgames you don't learn until you're deep in. The complexity is brutal. Learning curve is steep. Tutorial won't save you - hit Reddit first. But if you can stomach the initial wall, you get a modern grand strategy game that fills a gap Stellaris can't touch.

Tim and Joe walk through faction design, agent mechanics, research trees, space combat, and why China is the hardest nation to infiltrate. Made by Pavonis Interactive, the team behind XCOM's Long War mod.

Most gamers over 40 get five hours a week to play games. That's 300 hours for the entire year. We picked strategy titles that work when you can only play in short bursts between work, family, and everything else competing for your time.

Al recommends Empire: Total War for its blend of grand strategy and tactical battles, plus it runs on iPad. Jack argues for Cities: Skylines because you can jump back in after a week and know exactly where you left off. Joe champions Dwarf Fortress for its ant-farm gameplay and the ability to set small goals each session.

We also cover Paradox's predatory move with Colossal Order, stripping Cities: Skylines from the original developer and relocating it to Ice Flake Studios in the same city. The plan appears designed to poach talent and kill the studio that built the franchise.

Jack, Al, and Sid go through strategy games shipping in 2026. Sanctuary Shattered Sun from the Supreme Commander lineage. Dawn of War 4 returning to classic RTS after Relic lost the license. Total War 40K launching with four factions, no confirmed fleet battles. Three space strategy indies trying different approaches: Falling Frontier's physics-based combat, Fragile Existence's solo dev survival angle, Beyond Astra's grand strategy focus. Heroes of Might and Magic Olden Era already proved itself in the demo. Stronghold coming back.

We question whether small teams can deliver on ambitious scopes, why King Art keeps releasing updates while others go silent, and what Total War 40K needs to do right given Warhammer Fantasy's foundation.

The Critical Moves team reviews our first full year covering strategy gaming and explains why "the gaming industry is dying" headlines miss the point completely.

We interviewed developers from Luke Hughes (Burden of Command) to Brandon Castile (Tempest Rising) to Thomas Vandenberg (Kingdom series). Covered games from solo developers and Xbox Game Studios teams. Went from zero listeners to half a million YouTube views in 14 months without spending money on advertising.

The discussion covers why AAA layoffs do not equal industry collapse. How 100,000 copies sold can sustain an indie strategy studio. Why we rejected review codes for poor games instead of lying to our audience. What makes strategy gaming coverage different when you answer to listeners instead of publishers.

Strategy gamers, indie developers, and anyone tired of gaming journalism that inflates scores and avoids criticism will find this conversation relevant.

We turned down opportunities to compromise. We will continue doing that in 2026.

Our best games of 2025 are a DLC for a 2023 game, a DLC for a 2022 game, and a remaster of a 2004 game. That tells you everything about the state of strategy gaming this year.

Adam picked Spell Force Conquest of Eo's Children of Norn expansion because the developers keep supporting a game that deserves more players. The complexity puts it somewhere between Heroes of Might and Magic and Age of Wonders 4, with combat that stays interesting instead of devolving into auto-resolve spam. Tim went with Victoria 3's Charter of Commerce, the mechanics pack that fixed the global economy and turned trade from a micromanagement nightmare into something that works. Al chose Dawn of War Definitive Edition, which proves a 21-year-old RTS still plays better than most modern releases when you update the graphics and preserve mod support.

Civilization 7 was up for Game Awards strategy game of the year despite being a cash grab that copied Humankind's worst ideas. They've already patched in the ability to keep the same leader across ages because the backlash was immediate. Tempest Rising almost made Al's top pick but lacks the campiness that made Command and Conquer memorable. Broken Arrow exists but you still can't save during campaign missions. Final Fantasy Tactics Reborn won the Game Awards, which is fine, but it's another remaster.

The podcast covers why Spell Force's combat stays fresh, how Victoria 3's economy finally works, what Relic got right with the Dawn of War remaster, and why 2026 looks significantly better with Total War 40K, Dawn of War 4, and other releases on the horizon.

Creative Assembly announced Medieval 3 and Total War Warhammer 40K within two weeks. We break down what we know, what's missing, and whether the new Warcore engine can handle what these games need to deliver.

Medieval 3 won't arrive until 2027 at the earliest, possibly 2028. The game promises more than just map painting with systems borrowed from Crusader Kings territory, but the challenge is finding the middle ground between Medieval 2 Definitive Edition and overcomplicated mechanics that alienate the core audience.

Total War Warhammer 40K launches in 2026 with four factions at release. The excitement is real, but so are the concerns. The lack of confirmed player-controlled space combat is a problem when Battlefleet Gothic Armada managed proper naval warfare a decade ago. Creative Assembly has talked about fleets moving between planets, but they haven't said the words that matter: you will control ships in battle.

The simultaneous PC and console release raises questions about complexity being sacrificed for accessibility. The DLC model from Warhammer Fantasy could get expensive fast when you're dealing with a galaxy worth of factions. Chaos Space Marines missing at launch signals what's coming.

We cover the new Warcore engine, whether Creative Assembly learned from the Rome 2 disaster, and what needs to happen for these games to work. The potential is there. The execution remains to be seen.