
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This is part two of three in critical thinking. Last time, we looked at the straw man fallacy and the importance of representing a position accurately. This time, we are looking at whether a worldview or a claim matches with itself and whether it matches with life. When happens when you turn someone's claim back on itself? Does the idea self-destruct? Does it match up with the way the person lives? Here are some tools to detecting these, including some specific examples from non-Christians and Christians.
By Evan Van SickleThis is part two of three in critical thinking. Last time, we looked at the straw man fallacy and the importance of representing a position accurately. This time, we are looking at whether a worldview or a claim matches with itself and whether it matches with life. When happens when you turn someone's claim back on itself? Does the idea self-destruct? Does it match up with the way the person lives? Here are some tools to detecting these, including some specific examples from non-Christians and Christians.