Today, we sit down with attorney Cara Trapani, a Partner at Buehler Trapani LLP, to talk about the intersection of entrepreneurship and wellness in law. Join us as we share our experiences as law firm owners, and discuss practical tips for prioritizing mental and physical wellness in the process.

Tune in as Jasmin explores nepotism in the context of reviewing employee complaints. She'll explain why internal investigations can be compromised when the boss is related to an involved party, and why hiring an independent, third-party investigator is essential to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the process.

Picking up where we left off, Jasmin is back to tackle the final four credibility factors outlined in the CRD's Harassment Prevention Guide. Tune in as she explains what the final four factors mean and offers tips to help you confidently apply the credibility factors in your own investigations.

As an investigator, what do you do when the only evidence in a case is one party's statement against the other? In this two-part series, we're diving into the eight credibility factors as outlined by the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) for workplace investigations. This episode will cover the initial four factors.

In this insightful episode, Lita Abella, J.D. helps us unpack practical strategies for attorneys and law firm organizations to mitigate stress and cultivate well-being in a demanding profession. We'll explore the transformative power of her soon-to-be released book “The ABELLA Model Leading High Stress Professionals with Trauma-Informed Practices.”

Join Jasmin as she lays the groundwork for understanding intersectional discrimination, explaining its legal basis under California law and clarifying how multiple protected characteristics can create unique forms of bias.

Discover ways school administrators and investigators can leverage parental involvement to conduct more effective and thorough school investigations. In this episode, Jasmin explores strategies for building trust and collaboration with parents during the investigation process.

Have you been pressured by a potential client to sign an indemnification clause as a condition for retaining your services? Then this is for you! In this episode, we're dissecting why these complex clauses can be an attorney investigator's worst nightmare. From compromising your independence as an investigator to making witnesses wary, we'll explain why protecting yourself means saying "no" to unlimited liability.

In this episode, Jasmin discussed some inclusive investigation techniques, empowering internal investigators to conduct ironclad investigations for all, especially witnesses with disabilities!

The Supreme Court's Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services decision just abolished the "background circumstances" rule, simplifying "reverse discrimination" claims under Title VII. This episode provides a quick debrief on the ruling and its implications for workplace investigations. For HR professionals and legal teams, this means a fresh look at your complaint investigation processes is essential.