David Watson is accused of not one, not two, but three murders. But with no direct evidence, no eyewitnesses, no murder weapon, and in one case no concrete proof there was even a murder, will the jury be convinced by the prosecution or the defense?
David Watson is accused of not one, not two, but three murders. But with no direct evidence, no eyewitnesses, no murder weapon, and in one case no concrete proof there was even a murder, will the jury be convinced by the prosecution or the defense?