Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #DDMS Episode 39: Inside a Probable Cause Affidavit: The Charlie Kirk Case Breakdown
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#DDMS Episode 39: Inside a Probable Cause Affidavit: The Charlie Kirk Case Breakdown
Send us a text
A father’s vow to “kill the man” who took his six-year-old son’s life sets a raw tone—and it’s impossible not to feel that rage. We start there, with the Logan Tipton case: the 911 call from an eleven-year-old sister, a dad holding his boy in his arms, and a justice system that releases the killer under supervision in under a decade. That anger is real. But the path forward requires more than fury. So we pivot into the Charlie Kirk shooting with a different tool: the probable cause affidavit.
We walk you through the affidavit like a map. What is it? A sworn, legal document that must meet the elements of each crime. What’s inside? A detailed narrative of the UVU setup, surveillance footage that tracks a suspect to a rooftop, a bolt-action rifle recovered with one spent round, forensics linking DNA to the trigger and casings, and messages to a roommate about intent, the drop point, and deleting evidence. We unpack the full charge list—aggravated murder, felony discharge, obstruction, tampering, and enhancements for victim targeting and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child—and show how each count ties to specific facts rather than speculation.
If you’ve heard claims about a lapel mic firing a round or a security guard as the shooter, we address why the affidavit pushes back: vantage point, trajectory, rooftop impressions, recovered weapon, etched rounds, and a paper trail of texts that read like a confession. The point isn’t to shut down questions; it’s to anchor them in verifiable evidence. Along the way, we talk about sentencing, parole, and how public trust breaks when punishment doesn’t match the harm—without abandoning due process or clarity.
Stick around to the end for how we plan to expand this into a longer video breakdown. If this deep dive helps you separate outrage from proof, share it with a friend, subscribe, and leave a review. Then tell us: after hearing the evidence, what questions do you still have?
Support the show
Thank you all for all the support! I couldn't do this without everyone's support! Please have a great week and stay safe! Please check out our Patreon to support us and help us grow! https://www.patreon.com/DEPUTYDANE
View all episodes
By DaneSend us a text
A father’s vow to “kill the man” who took his six-year-old son’s life sets a raw tone—and it’s impossible not to feel that rage. We start there, with the Logan Tipton case: the 911 call from an eleven-year-old sister, a dad holding his boy in his arms, and a justice system that releases the killer under supervision in under a decade. That anger is real. But the path forward requires more than fury. So we pivot into the Charlie Kirk shooting with a different tool: the probable cause affidavit.
We walk you through the affidavit like a map. What is it? A sworn, legal document that must meet the elements of each crime. What’s inside? A detailed narrative of the UVU setup, surveillance footage that tracks a suspect to a rooftop, a bolt-action rifle recovered with one spent round, forensics linking DNA to the trigger and casings, and messages to a roommate about intent, the drop point, and deleting evidence. We unpack the full charge list—aggravated murder, felony discharge, obstruction, tampering, and enhancements for victim targeting and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child—and show how each count ties to specific facts rather than speculation.
If you’ve heard claims about a lapel mic firing a round or a security guard as the shooter, we address why the affidavit pushes back: vantage point, trajectory, rooftop impressions, recovered weapon, etched rounds, and a paper trail of texts that read like a confession. The point isn’t to shut down questions; it’s to anchor them in verifiable evidence. Along the way, we talk about sentencing, parole, and how public trust breaks when punishment doesn’t match the harm—without abandoning due process or clarity.
Stick around to the end for how we plan to expand this into a longer video breakdown. If this deep dive helps you separate outrage from proof, share it with a friend, subscribe, and leave a review. Then tell us: after hearing the evidence, what questions do you still have?
Support the show
Thank you all for all the support! I couldn't do this without everyone's support! Please have a great week and stay safe! Please check out our Patreon to support us and help us grow! https://www.patreon.com/DEPUTYDANE