Out of thirty-something appeals that I have done out of foreclosure cases every time I am appealing a judge who entered a ruling at a trial level I get PCA. The trial judge enter a final judgement that doesn't answer any of my legal arguments or make any conclusions of law. We are discussing this matter in detail. Is this a matter of rulling in favor of the wealthy? Aren't thelegal arguments suppose to be analyze? Why are they beign ignored?

"Per curiam affirmed" (PCA) refers to a decison of a court, without identifying any judges by name, finding that the decision of a lower court was correct. Such a decision is often made without rendering an opinion.