In this episode, I provide critical, science-based answers to the following questions:* Don’t traditional clinical tests miss the glucose variability that can only be detected by CGM?* Doesn’t high blood glucose predict heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, etc.? So, this is a reason for non-diabetics to use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), right?* Doesn’t high blood glucose variability predict heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, etc.?* OK, but although we don’t know exactly what the cutoffs should be for blood glucose spikes, doesn’t simply reducing blood glucose provide a benefit?* Wait, I thought that CGM simply helped people to eat in a healthier way? Lowering carbohydrate is not necessary right?* But don’t responses to each particular food differ from person to person?* Doesn’t reducing glucose spikes reduce hunger?* But I feel that CGM benefits me personally. Are you saying I cannot use CGM* What harm could there be from using CGM as a nondiabetic?I conclude that there is no evidence of benefit, no evidence for what CGM readings mean, and that the use of CGM to make nutritional choices could cause harm.===Like, comment, subscribe.For more, find me at:PODCAST The Kevin Bass ShowYOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/user/kbassphiladelphiaSUBREDDIT www.reddit.com/r/kevinbassWEBSITE http://thedietwars.comTWITTER https://twitter.com/kevinnbass/https://twitter.com/healthmisinfo/INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/kevinnbass/TIKTOK https://tiktok.com/@kevinnbassAnd above all, please donate to support what I do:PATREON https://patreon.com/kevinnbass/DONATE https://thedietwars.com/support-me/