The Libertarian Party removed its abortion plank in 2022, ending fifty years of failed attempts to articulate a consistent position on women's and children's rights. This episode traces that history — from the LP's first platform in 1972 through the debates that led to removal — and examines what the change does and doesn't mean. Removing the plank doesn't make the LP officially pro-life, and it doesn't abandon the party's principles on women's rights. It reflects what has always been true: libertarians are genuinely divided on abortion. The deeper question — whether abortion constitutes a rights violation under the non-aggression principle — remains unresolved, and that is the debate libertarian philosophers now have to face.

_*]:min-w-0 gap-3"> Main Points of Discussion 00:00 Introduction: Is the LP pro-choice? What the platform's silence means 05:30 The LP's abortion plank from 1972 through 2000: a history of failed attempts 06:44 Division within the LP: the long-standing split on abortion 08:45 The case for removal: neutrality, consistency, and avoiding infighting 11:02 The Dallas Accord and the "big tent" argument 14:30 Does silence on abortion threaten the rights of women? 18:43 What other LP platform sections say about individual rights and government intervention 20:30 Core libertarian values that remain in the platform after removal 23:02 Why removal was a move toward consistency, not abandonment of principle 23:45 The unresolved philosophical task: reconciling women's and fetal rights under the NAP