Decoding the truth part 2: Breaking down the 911 call with the Peter Hyatt Statement Analysis team..

This week, our goal was to "unmask the deception" in Aaron Solomon's 911 call (with the help of the brilliant Paul Maillardet from the Peter Hyatt Statement Analysis team). 911 calls are often a lifeline in emergencies, connecting distressed individuals with first responders who can provide assistance.  However, some 911 calls require a trained ear to detect a lack of integrity or truth. Thanks to the diligent work of the Statement Analysis Team, major red flags have been brought to light in this episode. Why did police not pick up on these three years ago?

SHOW NOTES:

https://www.hyattanalysis.com/

https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-get-justice-for-grant

https://www.change.org/p/please-help-me-investigate-the-mysterious-death-of-my-son-grant-solomon

CONCLUSION NOTES:

1.     Did the caller prioritize Grant’s plight?    No  2.     Did the caller facilitate the flow of information to help Grant?   No 3.     Did the caller show empathy towards Grant?   No 4.     Did the caller indicate for subtle blaming of the victim?  Yes  5.     Did the caller distance himself from Grant? Yes  6.     Did the caller describe the attempts to save Grant?  No  7.     Did the caller ask for help in saving Grant?  (instructions, guidance) No  8.     Did the caller address Grant’s current state to better help responders? No 9.     Did the caller indicate for candor in this call?  No  SOME NOTES ABOUT THE BEHAVIOR OF THE CALLER:

He has a need to explain, repeatedly, that he does not know how this happened is unexpected while his son is in such danger. 

Constantly: blaming the car , blaming the victim, blaming the infinite possibilities, delaying by invoking God and not demanding help is not the way to save your son's life

DISCLAIMER:

The following podcast episode features commentary and insights from a team of statement analysts. We would like to stress that the information provided in this episode is intended for informational and educational purposes only. 

Accuracy of Information: The information presented in this podcast episode is based on the available evidence, reports, and public records. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, details may be subject to errors or omissions. Listeners are encouraged to conduct their own research as well.

Opinion and Speculation: Throughout the podcast, there may be instances where opinions and/or speculation are expressed regarding certain events, individuals, or circumstances. These are the personal perspectives of the podcast hosts or guests and should not be taken as conclusive or factual statements. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.